Vereshchagin N V, Chukhrova V A, Bragina L K, Vavilov S B, Pokrovskaia Z A
Zh Nevropatol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 1984;84(8):1126-33.
The results of electroencephalographic (EEG) and computer-aided tomographic (CT) examinations were compared in order to specify the possibilities of EEG in the topical diagnosis in cases of the compromised cerebral circulation (a hundred patients had been studied). The CT and EEG findings were closely correlated (80%) when the focus was localized in the hemispheres; discrepancies were observed (20%) in cases of extensive haemorrhages, with blood invading the ventricular system, in cases of microfoci lying in the deep portions of the cerebral hemispheres and also when foci were present in both hemispheres. In cases of the trunk localization of the focus, the EEG and CT findings were correlated in only 37%. The discrepancies of the two methods predominantly concerned impairments of the lower portions of the trunk where the EEG technique proved more informative.
对脑电图(EEG)和计算机断层扫描(CT)检查结果进行了比较,以明确EEG在脑循环受损病例局部诊断中的可能性(共研究了100例患者)。当病灶位于半球时,CT和EEG结果密切相关(80%);在广泛出血、血液侵入脑室系统、脑半球深部存在微病灶以及双侧半球均有病灶的情况下,观察到有差异(20%)。当病灶位于脑干时,EEG和CT结果仅37%相关。两种方法的差异主要涉及脑干下部的损伤,在这些部位EEG技术显示出更多信息。