Veldhuis J D, Evans W S, Rogol A D, Drake C R, Thorner M O, Merriam G R, Johnson M L
Am J Physiol. 1984 Oct;247(4 Pt 1):E554-63. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1984.247.4.E554.
To assess the influence of the sampling rate on the quantitative characterization of pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) release, we withdrew blood at 4-min intervals for 8 h in five men and at 1-min intervals for 2 h in six other men. For comparative purposes, significant LH pulses were enumerated by three independent, computerized pulse-detection algorithms currently available. Our results indicate that, although the absolute number of LH pulses detected was influenced by the particular algorithm used and the estimate of intra-assay variance, all three analyses yielded increased pulse-frequency estimates at more intensive rates of venous sampling. Moreover, using a fourth, modified pulse-detection algorithm intended to maximize recognition of true-positive LH pulses while minimizing both false-positive and false-negative pulses, we observed that venous sampling at 4- and 1-min intervals exposed 4- and 12-fold more LH pulses, respectively, than could be discerned at conventional sampling rates. At rapid rates of venous sampling, the pattern of LH pulses comprised high-frequency, low-amplitude LH pulsations superimposed on lower-frequency LH peaks. This pattern suggests that the pituitary gland is responsive to high rates of intermittent neural stimulation. Moreover, these observed profiles are consistent with rapid initial rates of LH disappearance and/or distribution that we could demonstrate after intravenous bolus injections of purified LH in hypogonadotropic volunteers. In conclusion, we have compared results from three different pulse-detection algorithms at various rates of venous sampling and demonstrated a critical influence of sampling rate on apparent LH pulse frequency in humans.
为评估采样率对促黄体生成素(LH)脉冲式释放定量特征的影响,我们对5名男性每隔4分钟采集一次血样,持续8小时;对另外6名男性每隔1分钟采集一次血样,持续2小时。为便于比较,采用目前可用的三种独立的计算机化脉冲检测算法对显著的LH脉冲进行计数。我们的结果表明,尽管检测到的LH脉冲绝对数量受所用特定算法和分析内方差估计的影响,但所有三种分析在更密集的静脉采样率下都得出了更高的脉冲频率估计值。此外,使用第四种经过改进的脉冲检测算法,旨在最大限度地识别真正的阳性LH脉冲,同时尽量减少假阳性和假阴性脉冲,我们观察到,与传统采样率相比,每隔4分钟和1分钟进行静脉采样分别能检测到多4倍和12倍的LH脉冲。在快速静脉采样率下,LH脉冲模式包括高频、低振幅的LH波动叠加在低频LH峰值上。这种模式表明垂体对高频间歇性神经刺激有反应。此外,这些观察到的特征与我们在性腺功能减退志愿者静脉推注纯化LH后能够证明的LH快速初始消失和/或分布速率一致。总之,我们比较了三种不同脉冲检测算法在不同静脉采样率下的结果,并证明了采样率对人类LH表观脉冲频率有至关重要的影响。