Veldhuis J D, Evans W S, Johnson M L, Wills M R, Rogol A D
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986 May;62(5):881-91. doi: 10.1210/jcem-62-5-881.
The pulsatile nature of the gonadotropin signal is a critical determinant of physiological activation of the gonadal axis. Nonetheless, major uncertainties exist regarding the exact patterns of LH secretion that constitute normal physiological profiles in man. To assess possible bases for the discrepancies in the literature, we sampled blood at 5-min intervals for 24 h in eight normal men and eight normal women in the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. The constituent 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-min immunoactive LH series and the consituent 6-, 12-, or 24-h sampling durations provided ranges of sampling intensities and durations for analysis of significant LH pulses. A technique for minimizing the influence of false positive immunoassay errors on peak detection was used to aid in estimating apparent true positive LH pulse frequency. Nonlinear curve fitting of the relationship between sampling intensity and apparent true positive LH pulse frequency revealed a stable pulse frequency estimate at intensive rates of venous sampling, with values of 19.5 +/- 1.9 (+/- SEM) pulses/24 h (periodicity, 73.8 +/- 6.5 min/pulse) in men and 20.6 +/- 3.6 pulses/24 h (periodicity, 70.0 +/- 10 min/pulse) in women. Further analyses indicated that sampling every 3.1 and 2.0 min for 24 h would be required to capture 90% of the LH pulses in men and women, respectively. Moreover, even with a 5-min sampling rate, the statistical counting errors of the LH pulse frequency estimates varied markedly with sampling duration; for example, in men sampled in 6-, 12-, and 24-hr sessions, the values were, respectively, 49%, 35%, and 24% of the observed pulse frequencies. Similar variations were found in women. Counting errors were 30-50% higher for conventional 20-min sampling rates than for 5-min sampling intervals. Measured interpulse intervals varied widely from 10-330 min (median, 60 min; n = 131 LH pulses) in men and from 10-340 min (median, 65 min; n = 125 LH pulses) in women. In addition, absolute LH pulse amplitudes varied from 1-28 mIU/ml (median, 4.1 mIU/ml) in men and from 1-24 mIU/ml (median, 3.6 mIU/ml) in women. These estimates were associated with a median number of points identified within each pulse of 6.0 in men and 4.0 in women. In summary, the present exhaustive sampling studies demonstrate for the first time stable estimates of physiological LH pulsations in normal men and women, and document broad ranges of normal LH pulse amplitudes and interpulse intervals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
促性腺激素信号的脉冲性质是性腺轴生理激活的关键决定因素。尽管如此,关于构成男性正常生理特征的促黄体生成素(LH)分泌的确切模式仍存在重大不确定性。为了评估文献中差异的可能原因,我们在月经周期卵泡早期对8名正常男性和8名正常女性每隔5分钟采集一次血样,共采集24小时。5分钟、10分钟、15分钟和20分钟的免疫活性LH系列以及6小时、12小时或24小时的采样持续时间,提供了不同的采样强度和持续时间范围,用于分析显著的LH脉冲。一种将假阳性免疫测定误差对峰值检测的影响降至最低的技术,有助于估计表观真实的LH脉冲频率。对采样强度与表观真实LH脉冲频率之间的关系进行非线性曲线拟合,结果显示在密集的静脉采样率下,脉冲频率估计值稳定,男性为19.5±1.9(±标准误)次脉冲/24小时(周期为73.8±6.5分钟/脉冲),女性为20.6±3.6次脉冲/24小时(周期为70.0±10分钟/脉冲)。进一步分析表明,分别需要每隔3.1分钟和2.0分钟进行24小时采样,才能捕捉到男性和女性90%的LH脉冲。此外,即使采样率为5分钟,LH脉冲频率估计值的统计计数误差也会随采样持续时间显著变化;例如,在6小时、12小时和24小时采样的男性中,这些值分别为观察到的脉冲频率的49%、35%和24%。在女性中也发现了类似的变化。传统的20分钟采样率的计数误差比5分钟采样间隔高30 - 50%。男性测量的脉冲间期在10 - 330分钟之间广泛变化(中位数为60分钟;n = 131个LH脉冲),女性在10 - 340分钟之间(中位数为65分钟;n = 125个LH脉冲)。此外,男性LH脉冲的绝对幅度在1 - 28 mIU/ml之间(中位数为4.1 mIU/ml),女性在1 - 24 mIU/ml之间(中位数为3.6 mIU/ml)。这些估计值与男性每个脉冲内识别出的中位数点数6.0以及女性的4.0相关。总之,目前的详尽采样研究首次证明了对正常男性和女性生理LH波动的稳定估计,并记录了正常LH脉冲幅度和脉冲间期的广泛范围。(摘要截短至400字)