Why the British courts rejected the American doctrine of informed consent (and what British physicians should do about it).
作者信息
Annas G J
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 1984 Nov;74(11):1286-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.11.1286.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Why the British courts rejected the American doctrine of informed consent (and what British physicians should do about it).为何英国法院拒绝接受美国的知情同意原则（以及英国医生对此应如何应对）。
Am J Public Health. 1984 Nov;74(11):1286-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.11.1286.
2
Why Britain can't afford informed consent.为何英国承担不起知情同意的代价。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1985 Aug;15(4):19-25.
3
Consent to medical procedures: paternalism, self-determination or therapeutic alliance?医疗程序同意书：家长主义、自主决定权还是治疗联盟？
Law Q Rev. 1985 Jul;101:432-53.
4
The surgeon's duty to warn of risks: transatlantic approach rejected by Court of Appeal.外科医生告知风险的义务：上诉法院驳回跨大西洋的处理方式
Lancet. 1984 Mar 10;1(8376):578-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)90989-9.
5
What should a doctor tell?医生应该告知什么？
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Aug 4;289(6440):325-6.
6
7
Consent to treatment: the medical standard reaffirmed.治疗同意书：重申医学标准。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Mar 10;288(6419):802-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6419.802.
8
The Sidaway case.西达韦案
Lancet. 1985 Mar 23;1(8430):709. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)91378-9.
9
The meaning of informed consent.知情同意的含义。
Med Leg J. 1986;54(1):11-25.
10
Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital.西达韦诉贝特勒姆皇家医院案
All Engl Law Rep. 1984 Feb 23;[1984] 1:1018-36.
引用本文的文献
1
Why the goals of informed consent are not realized: treatise on informed consent for the primary care physician.为何知情同意的目标未能实现：给初级保健医生的知情同意论述
J Gen Intern Med. 1988 Jul-Aug;3(4):370-80. doi: 10.1007/BF02595796.
2
Medical malpractice in perspective. II--The implications for Britain.医疗事故的透视。II——对英国的影响。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Jun 20;294(6587):1597-600. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6587.1597.
3
Green College lectures. The responsibility of the doctor.格林学院讲座。医生的职责。
BMJ. 1989 Aug 19;299(6697):503-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6697.503.
Zotero 插件