Waters W E
Ann Acad Med Singap. 1984 Apr;13(2):272-6.
The time allocated to epidemiology in the medical curriculum of most medical schools has increased and its importance has gained more general acceptance. The reason "Why?" epidemiology should be taught is perhaps best given by the World Health Organisation's report that epidemiology should aim to influence the future doctor's attitude to the problems of health and disease in the community by making the student more aware of the scientific approach to those problems. The question "How?" epidemiology should be taught is more difficult and there is evidence, at least from the United Kingdom, that the subject is regarded as both dull and the least difficult of sixteen subjects investigated. The question of whether epidemiology should be taught as a separate discipline or integrated into the curriculum is perhaps best answered by saying both should be done. The methods of instruction vary and a combination of methods is desirable in any course. The relations between epidemiology and other subjects and the place of epidemiology in formal examinations, varies greatly between medical schools. The ideal solutions to these and other problems still lie in the future.
大多数医学院校医学课程中分配给流行病学的时间有所增加,其重要性也得到了更广泛的认可。世界卫生组织的报告或许最能说明为何要教授流行病学,该报告指出,流行病学应旨在通过让学生更清楚地了解解决这些问题的科学方法,来影响未来医生对社区健康与疾病问题的态度。如何教授流行病学这个问题则更具难度,至少从英国的情况来看,有证据表明该学科被认为既枯燥乏味,又是所调查的16门学科中难度最小的。流行病学是应作为一门独立学科来教授,还是融入课程之中,或许最好的回答是两者都应进行。教学方法各不相同,任何课程都需要多种方法相结合。不同医学院校中,流行病学与其他学科的关系以及流行病学在正式考试中的地位差异很大。这些问题及其他问题的理想解决方案仍有待未来探索。