Suppr超能文献

术中体感诱发电位的定量分析

Quantification of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential.

作者信息

Gonzalez E G, Hajdu M, Keim H, Brand L

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984 Nov;65(11):721-5.

PMID:6497619
Abstract

Cortical (C) and spinal (S) somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) were measured and quantified in 30 patients undergoing scoliosis surgery during the following periods: I, preincision; II, hypotension; III, instrumentation; IV, postinstrumentation; and V, skin closure. Paired two-tailed t tests were performed on all commonly measured SEP parameters comparing values obtained at periods I and II with each subsequent period. CSEP were obtained with Cz-Fz recording sites of the international 10-20 system while SSEP were obtained with recording electrodes at C7-Fz, following bilateral posterior tibial nerve stimulation at the ankles. From period I, CSEP P1 prolonged significantly across all periods but not from period II to subsequent periods. N1 remained stable from either period I or II until period V when latencies increased. P1-N1 amplitude decreased significantly between period I and other periods until period V when near base value was regained. Compared to period II however, P1-N1 amplitude did not differ significantly until period V when it increased beyond base. CSEP P2 and N2 latencies and amplitudes were less distinct and had high variability under our anesthetic technique which consisted of N2O-O2 and isoflurane 0.25%-0.50%, narcotics, nondepolarizing blocking agents, and induced hypotension. When attainable, they behaved in a similar pattern to the early CSEP. SSEP were obtained in 23 cases. The stability of latencies and amplitudes compared favorably with CSEP P1 and N1. Graphs of relative percent changes were developed for clinical use. It is concluded that the noninvasive monitoring technique described is practical, and that P1 and N1 CSEP and SSEP values are reliable monitoring parameters.

摘要

在30例接受脊柱侧弯手术的患者中,于以下各阶段测量并量化了皮质(C)和脊髓(S)体感诱发电位(SEP):阶段I,切开前;阶段II,低血压期;阶段III,器械植入期;阶段IV,器械植入后;阶段V,皮肤缝合时。对所有常用的SEP参数进行配对双尾t检验,比较阶段I和II与随后各阶段获得的值。CSEP通过国际10-20系统的Cz-Fz记录部位获得,而SSEP通过在双侧踝部刺激胫后神经后,于C7-Fz处放置记录电极获得。从阶段I开始,CSEP的P1在所有阶段均显著延长,但从阶段II到随后各阶段则不然。N1从阶段I或II开始直至阶段V潜伏期增加前一直保持稳定。P1-N1波幅在阶段I与其他阶段之间显著降低,直至阶段V时恢复至接近基础值。然而,与阶段II相比,P1-N1波幅直到阶段V才显著不同,此时其超过基础值而增加。在我们由笑气-氧气和0.25%-0.50%异氟烷、麻醉性镇痛药、非去极化阻滞剂及诱导性低血压组成的麻醉技术下,CSEP的P2和N2潜伏期及波幅不太明显且变异性高。在可行时,它们的表现与早期CSEP相似。23例患者获得了SSEP。其潜伏期和波幅的稳定性与CSEP的P1和N1相比良好。绘制了相对百分比变化图以供临床使用。结论是所描述的非侵入性监测技术是实用的,并且CSEP和SSEP的P1和N1值是可靠的监测参数。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验