Collins W F
Br J Surg. 1984 Dec;71(12):974-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800711222.
Spinal cord injury remains a devastating event to the person sustaining the injury. Not only the cost of acute and rehabilitation care, but also the loss of productivity of the victims who are often young men injured at a highly productive period of their lives are a costly illness for society as a whole. In the past 20-30 years, there has been continual improvement in the morbidity and mortality from spinal cord injury with the improvement in prevention of a second injury, prevention of secondary renal, pulmonary and cutaneous complications, better techniques for stabilization of the spinal column, and more effective utilization of remaining neurological function with improved rehabilitation therapy. It remains, however, difficult to demonstrate an effect from a wide range of 'acceptable' medical or surgical care on the resultant loss of spinal cord function. The lack of improvement in preventing or reversing the loss of spinal cord function in spite of marked variations in acute spinal cord injury care indicate that acceptable data are still lacking to determine the role of aggressive and conservative management. The need for a more organized approach to the problem is obvious.
脊髓损伤对于遭受损伤的人来说仍然是一场灾难性事件。不仅急性和康复护理费用高昂,而且受害者往往是在生命中高产期受伤的年轻男性,他们生产力的丧失对整个社会而言也是一种代价高昂的疾病。在过去二三十年里,随着二次损伤预防、继发性肾脏、肺部和皮肤并发症预防的改善,脊柱稳定技术的提高,以及通过改进康复治疗更有效地利用剩余神经功能,脊髓损伤的发病率和死亡率持续下降。然而,要证明各种“可接受的”医疗或手术护理对最终脊髓功能丧失的影响仍然很困难。尽管急性脊髓损伤护理存在显著差异,但在预防或逆转脊髓功能丧失方面缺乏改善,这表明仍缺乏可接受的数据来确定积极治疗和保守治疗的作用。显然需要一种更有组织的方法来解决这个问题。