Beutler L E, Scott F B, Karacan I, Baer P E, Rogers R R, Morris J
Urology. 1984 Dec;24(6):552-8. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(84)90100-6.
We evaluated 49 women whose sexual partners were organically impotent and subsequently received either an inflatable or noninflatable penile prosthesis. The women comprised three groups, based on the type of prostheses their partners had received: inflatable (n = 34), noninflatable (n = 11), and a double implant group (n = 4). The comparisons made were (1) dimensions of sexual satisfaction, (2) emotional stability, (3) satisfaction with the prosthesis, and (4) relationship changes. Two special questionnaires and the Derogatis Sexual Functioning Inventory were utilized in this evaluation. Women in the inflatable prosthesis group were found to be significantly more satisfied with the quality of their sexual relations and with their partner's prosthesis than were the women in the noninflatable prosthesis group. There apparently is a general advantage to women whose partners have received an inflatable prosthesis compared with the noninflatable alternatives.
我们评估了49名女性，她们的性伴侣患有器质性阳痿，随后接受了可充气或不可充气阴茎假体植入。根据其伴侣所接受的假体类型，这些女性被分为三组：可充气组（n = 34）、不可充气组（n = 11）和双植入组（n = 4）。所进行的比较包括：（1）性满意度维度；（2）情绪稳定性；（3）对假体的满意度；（4）关系变化。本次评估使用了两份特殊问卷和德罗加蒂斯性功能量表。结果发现，与不可充气假体组的女性相比，可充气假体组的女性对其性关系质量和伴侣的假体满意度明显更高。显然，与不可充气假体相比，伴侣接受可充气假体植入的女性总体上具有优势。
