Urist M M, Balch C M, Soong S J, Milton G W, Shaw H M, McGovern V J, Murad T M, McCarthy W H, Maddox W A
Ann Surg. 1984 Dec;200(6):769-75. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198412000-00017.
Single and multifactorial analyses were used to evaluate prognosis and results of surgical treatment in 534 clinical Stage I patients with head and neck cutaneous melanoma treated at the University of Alabama in Birmingham (U.S.A.) and the University of Sydney (Australia). This computerized data base was prospectively accumulated in over 90% of cases. Melanomas were about equally distributed between men and women. They were located on the skin of the face in 47%, neck in 27%, scalp in 13%, and the ear in 13% of patients. Both the results of the prognostic factors analyses and the surgical treatment demonstrated that lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) was distinct from the other two growth patterns, superficial spreading melanoma and nodular melanoma (SSM and NM). In a multifactorial analysis of the 453 patients with SSM and NM, the dominant prognostic variables were tumor thickness (p less than 0.00001), anatomic subsite (p = 0.0213), and ulceration (p = 0.0289). Patients with melanomas on the scalp or neck subsites fared worse than those with tumors located on the face or ear. The results differed for LMM, where thickness was not a significant predictor of survival, and the most dominant prognostic variable was ulceration (p = 0.0042). Local recurrence rates were low, being 2.4% for tumors less than 2.5 mm in thickness, but were 12.3% for tumors greater than or equal to 4.0 mm in thickness. Patients with SSM and NM lesions located on the head and neck had a lower survival rate than those with extremity melanomas in every tumor thickness category, although only those in the 0.76 to 1.49 mm thickness subgroup were significantly different (p = 0.0007). After 5 years of follow-up, patients who underwent an elective lymph node dissection for SSM and NM with a thickness range of 1.5 to 3.99 mm had a better survival (72%) than patients with melanomas of equivalent thickness whose initial treatment was wide excision alone (45%). LMM had a less aggressive biologic behavior compared to SSM or NM and was treated more conservatively. Thus, LMM lesions had an 85% 10-year survival rate with wide excision only, and there was no significant improvement in survival with ELND. Growth patterns, tumor thickness, ulceration, and anatomic subsites should be considered when evaluating risk factors and when making treatment decisions in head and neck melanoma patients.
采用单因素和多因素分析方法,对美国阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校和澳大利亚悉尼大学收治的534例临床I期头颈部皮肤黑色素瘤患者的预后及手术治疗结果进行评估。该计算机数据库前瞻性收集了超过90%的病例。黑色素瘤在男性和女性中的分布大致相等。47%的患者位于面部皮肤,27%位于颈部,13%位于头皮,13%位于耳部。预后因素分析和手术治疗结果均显示,恶性雀斑样痣黑色素瘤(LMM)与其他两种生长模式,即浅表扩散性黑色素瘤和结节性黑色素瘤(SSM和NM)不同。在对453例SSM和NM患者进行的多因素分析中,主要的预后变量是肿瘤厚度(p<0.00001)、解剖部位(p = 0.0213)和溃疡(p = 0.0289)。头皮或颈部解剖部位的黑色素瘤患者预后比面部或耳部肿瘤患者差。LMM的结果有所不同,厚度不是生存的显著预测因素,最主要的预后变量是溃疡(p = 0.0042)。局部复发率较低,厚度小于2.5mm的肿瘤为2.4%,但厚度大于或等于4.0mm的肿瘤为12.3%。头颈部SSM和NM病变患者在每个肿瘤厚度类别中的生存率均低于四肢黑色素瘤患者,尽管只有厚度在0.76至1.49mm亚组的患者有显著差异(p = 0.0007)。随访5年后,厚度范围为1.5至3.99mm的SSM和NM患者接受选择性淋巴结清扫后的生存率(为72%)高于初始仅行广泛切除的同等厚度黑色素瘤患者(45%)。与SSM或NM相比,LMM的生物学行为侵袭性较小,治疗更为保守。因此,LMM病变仅行广泛切除的10年生存率为85%,选择性淋巴结清扫对生存率无显著改善。在评估头颈部黑色素瘤患者的危险因素和制定治疗决策时,应考虑生长模式、肿瘤厚度、溃疡和解剖部位。