Harrison G, Ineichen B, Smith J, Morgan H G
Br J Psychiatry. 1984 Dec;145:605-11. doi: 10.1192/bjp.145.6.605.
Three groups of patients admitted compulsorily from populations with markedly different rates of compulsory psychiatric admissions were compared on a range of social and clinical data. Whilst West Indian and white patients from inner city areas differed in many respects, they were both more likely than other patients to be referred to the psychiatric services through police agencies, with little GP involvement and were often admitted from public places following disturbed behaviour. However, levels of violence and threatening behaviour were no higher among inner city patients, black or white, and once admitted, these groups showed similar treatment compliance to white patients who had been admitted compulsorily from suburban areas. Implications for primary care and delivery of psychiatric services are discussed.
对来自强制精神科住院率显著不同人群的三组强制住院患者,就一系列社会和临床数据进行了比较。虽然来自市中心区的西印度裔和白人患者在许多方面存在差异,但他们比其他患者更有可能通过警方被转介到精神科服务机构,很少有全科医生参与,且常在行为紊乱后从公共场所被收治。然而,市中心区的患者,无论黑人还是白人,其暴力和威胁行为水平并不更高,一旦入院,这些群体在治疗依从性方面与从郊区强制入院的白人患者相似。文中讨论了对初级保健和精神科服务提供的影响。