Potel M J, MacKay S A, Rubin J M, Aisen A M, Sayre R E
Invest Radiol. 1984 Nov-Dec;19(6):499-509. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198411000-00006.
We have studied the three-dimensional (3D) motion of left ventricular (LV) epicardial points by tracking one to three dozen coronary artery bifurcations in eleven human subjects. Wall motion was analyzed using several different coordinate systems: (1) cylindrical centered about the LV long axis, (2) spherical with origin at the LV center-of-gravity (COG), and (3) spherical with origin at the LV center-of-contraction (COC), the best-fit 3D point toward which the wall moves. The coordinate systems were studied both fixed and moving with time. Three-dimensional motions were decomposed into three directional components, with high radial (in and out) percentages being regarded as the figure-of-merit of a given coordinate system. Average percentage radial motions were fixed cylindrical 16%, fixed spherical COG 35%, fixed spherical COC 47%, moving cylindrical 17%, moving spherical COG 30%, moving spherical COC 91%. Spherical systems were generally better than cylindrical systems, with the COC representing a better origin than the COG. Moving systems were appreciably better than fixed only for the COC model, indicating that the COC, which traverses up and down the LV midline, moves significantly while the other systems are more stationary. At each instant in time, almost all (91%) of the 3D motion of the entire heart wall is directed toward a single moving 3D point, the COC. Thus, there exists in principle a near-perfect 3D heart wall motion model. Approximately 25% of 3D wall motion is unseen in conventional monoplane views. Also, any model that represents 3D wall motion only along fixed straight 3D lines (eg, end-diastole to end-systole) necessarily ignores 27% of the true 3D heart wall motion.
我们通过追踪11名人类受试者中一到三打的冠状动脉分支,研究了左心室(LV)心外膜点的三维(3D)运动。使用几种不同的坐标系分析壁运动:(1)以LV长轴为中心的柱面坐标系,(2)原点位于LV重心(COG)的球面坐标系,以及(3)原点位于LV收缩中心(COC)的球面坐标系,COC是壁向其移动的最佳拟合3D点。研究了固定和随时间移动的坐标系。三维运动被分解为三个方向分量,高径向(进出)百分比被视为给定坐标系的品质因数。平均径向运动百分比为:固定柱面坐标系16%,固定球面COG坐标系35%,固定球面COC坐标系47%,移动柱面坐标系17%,移动球面COG坐标系30%,移动球面COC坐标系91%。球面坐标系通常比柱面坐标系更好,COC比COG代表更好的原点。仅对于COC模型,移动坐标系明显优于固定坐标系,这表明沿LV中线上下移动的COC显著移动,而其他系统更稳定。在每个时刻,整个心脏壁的几乎所有(91%)3D运动都指向单个移动的3D点,即COC。因此,原则上存在一个近乎完美的3D心脏壁运动模型。在传统单平面视图中,约25%的3D壁运动是看不见的。此外,任何仅沿固定直线3D线(例如,舒张末期到收缩末期)表示3D壁运动的模型必然会忽略27%的真实3D心脏壁运动。