Cross W G, Pitkin R M
Obstet Gynecol. 1978 May;51(5):606-8. doi: 10.1097/00006250-197805000-00021.
The safety and efficacy of laminaria tents as an adjunct to labor induction near term were examined in a prospective, controlled, and randomized study involving insertion of laminaria into the cervical canal the evening prior to planned induction. Six of 35 subjects in whom laminaria were used entered labor spontaneously and delivered overnight, compared with 1 of 39 controls. Of the remainder, the Bishop score increased an average of 3.7 points, a highly significant change, in the laminaria-treated group compared with no change in the controls. Labor, induced primarily by amniotomy with intravenous oxytocin then given to patients in whom regular contractions did not begin within 8 hours, was shorter with laminaria use than in controls, though the amniotomy-to-delivery interval did not differ significantly. However, comparison of the subgroup with cervices relatively unfavorable for induction, indicated by an initial Bishop score of 5 or less, showed both length of labor and amniotomy-to-delivery interval to be significantly shorter (each by an average of 3 hours) in the laminaria-treated group compared with controls. Complications, including febrile morbidity, did not differ. We conclude that laminaria tents are both effective and safe as an adjunct to labor induction, acting by accelerating the preparatory changes in the cervix which normally occur in late pregnancy.
在一项前瞻性、对照性随机研究中,对临近足月引产时使用海带棒作为辅助手段的安全性和有效性进行了研究,该研究包括在计划引产的前一晚将海带棒插入宫颈管。使用海带棒的35名受试者中有6人自然发动分娩并在夜间分娩,而39名对照组受试者中只有1人自然发动分娩。在其余受试者中,与对照组无变化相比,海带棒治疗组的Bishop评分平均增加了3.7分,这是一个非常显著的变化。引产主要通过人工破膜进行,然后对8小时内未开始规律宫缩的患者静脉滴注缩宫素,使用海带棒引产的患者产程比对照组短,尽管人工破膜至分娩的间隔时间无显著差异。然而,对初始Bishop评分≤5表示宫颈相对不利于引产的亚组进行比较,结果显示,与对照组相比,海带棒治疗组的产程和人工破膜至分娩的间隔时间均显著缩短(各平均缩短3小时)。包括发热发病率在内的并发症并无差异。我们得出结论,海带棒作为引产辅助手段既有效又安全,其作用机制是加速宫颈在妊娠晚期通常会发生的准备性变化。