Del Campo J M, Granda J R, Pereiro E, Martinez C, Vega C, Bandres P, Mosquera J A
Rev Mal Respir. 1984;1(5):305-7.
The radiographs of 393 coal-cutters (or hewers) and 187 drillers were read independently by two pneumoconiosis experts following the complete 12 grade classification (BIT 1980). The two groups were comparable for age, tobacco and alcohol consumption, and respiratory symptoms but the VEMS was lower in he drillers (p = 0.05). There were significant radiological differences between the groups as follows: with the coal-cutters predominantly type "p" opacities and Category 1; in the drillers "q" and "v" opacities and category 3 were most frequent, and there were a large number of pseudo-tumoral masses and signs of hyperinflation. The two groups have a quantitative and qualitative differences in exposure; it is necessary to interpret the results as two different types of pneumoconiosis, although there are intermediate types. The coal cutters have coal-workers pneumoconiosis in the strictest sense, while the drillers have silicosis with mixed dusts, the latter being more aggressive and incapacitating. One should take account of the two types in epidemiological evaluations in coal miners. It helps to explain certain contradictory results.
393名采煤工(或掘进工)和187名钻孔工的X光片由两名尘肺病专家按照完整的12级分类标准(BIT 1980)独立阅片。两组在年龄、烟草和酒精消费量以及呼吸道症状方面具有可比性,但钻孔工的肺活量预计值较低(p = 0.05)。两组之间存在显著的放射学差异,具体如下:采煤工主要为“p”型阴影和1类;钻孔工中“q”和“v”型阴影以及3类最为常见,并且有大量假肿瘤团块和肺气肿迹象。两组在接触情况上存在定量和定性差异;尽管存在中间类型,但有必要将结果解释为两种不同类型的尘肺病。从最严格意义上讲,采煤工患煤工尘肺病,而钻孔工患混合性粉尘矽肺,后者更具侵袭性且使人丧失劳动能力。在煤矿工人的流行病学评估中应考虑这两种类型。这有助于解释某些相互矛盾的结果。