Parker L H, Cataldo M F, Bourland G, Emurian C S, Corbin R J, Page J M
J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Winter;17(4):413-27. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-413.
The popularity and reported success of biofeedback treatment for neuromuscular disorders has occurred despite a lack of research identifying the critical variables responsible for therapeutic gain. In this study, we assessed the degree to which severe neurological dysfunction could be improved by using one of the components present in all biofeedback treatment, contingency management. Three cases of orofacial dysfunction were treated by reinforcing specific improvements reliably detectable without the use of biofeedback equipment. The results showed that contingency management procedures alone were sufficient to improve overt motor responses but, unlike biofeedback treatment, did not produce decreases in the hypertonic muscle groups associated with the trained motor behavior. The findings suggest that sophisticated, expensive biofeedback equipment may not be necessary in treating some neuromuscular disorders and that important clinical gains may be achieved by redesigning the patient's daily environment to be contingently therapeutic, rather than only accommodating the disabilities of the physically handicapped.
尽管缺乏研究来确定生物反馈疗法治疗神经肌肉疾病取得疗效的关键变量,但该疗法仍广受欢迎且有报道称取得了成功。在本研究中,我们评估了使用所有生物反馈疗法中都存在的一个组成部分——权变管理,能够在多大程度上改善严重的神经功能障碍。通过强化在不使用生物反馈设备的情况下也能可靠检测到的特定改善情况,对三例口面部功能障碍患者进行了治疗。结果表明,仅权变管理程序就足以改善明显的运动反应,但与生物反馈疗法不同的是,它并没有使与训练的运动行为相关的高张力肌肉群减少。研究结果表明,在治疗某些神经肌肉疾病时,可能不需要复杂、昂贵的生物反馈设备,通过重新设计患者的日常环境使其具有权变治疗性,而非仅仅适应身体残疾者的残疾状况,可能会取得重要的临床疗效。