Spence R A, Rutherford W H
Arch Emerg Med. 1984 Mar;1(1):23-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.1.1.23.
Five hundred and six clean minor surgical procedures were carried out in an emergency theatre. One theatre was used for both clean and septic conditions; clean cases preceding the septic lesions. Sepsis rates were assessed prospectively and complete follow-up was obtained in 491 patients. Four hundred and fifty (91.6%) patients achieved primary healing. Thirty (6.1%) patients developed a mild serous discharge; three developed wound haematomas and eight (1.6%) patients had severely infected wounds with a purulent discharge. From the acceptably low incidence of severely infected wounds with a purulent discharge. From the acceptably low incidence of severely infected wounds we conclude that there is no need for separate clean and septic theatres in an emergency department provided the clean operations are comparatively short and simple procedures.
在一个急诊手术室进行了506例清洁小手术。一个手术室同时用于清洁和感染性手术;清洁手术在感染性手术之前进行。前瞻性评估了感染率,并对491例患者进行了完整的随访。450例(91.6%)患者实现一期愈合。30例(6.1%)患者出现轻度浆液性渗出;3例出现伤口血肿,8例(1.6%)患者伤口严重感染并有脓性渗出。鉴于脓性渗出的严重感染伤口发生率可接受地低。从脓性渗出的严重感染伤口发生率可接受地低这一情况来看,我们得出结论,在急诊科,如果清洁手术相对简短且操作简单,就无需设立单独的清洁和感染手术室。