• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A comparison of two conditioning procedures in the use of visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA).

作者信息

Thompson G, Folsom R C

出版信息

J Speech Hear Disord. 1984 Aug;49(3):241-5. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4903.241.

DOI:10.1044/jshd.4903.241
PMID:6540335
Abstract

This study compared the effects of two conditioning procedures in the use of visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) with 1- and 2-year-old high-risk infants. One conditioning procedure used a relatively soft initial stimulus presentation level (30 dB HL) and only two conditioning trials prior to minimum-response-level (MRL) exploration. The other procedure used a 60-dB HL initial presentation level and five conditioning trials prior to MRL exploration. Results indicated no significant differences between conditioning procedures in regard to obtained MRLs, number of stimulus presentations required to establish MRL (discounting conditioning trials), and number of false-positive responses observed during control trials. Age was a significant factor only in regard to the number of stimulus presentations required to establish MRL. 2-year-olds required fewer presentations than 1-year-olds. Results are discussed in relation to the auditory stimulus used to obtain responses and in regard to individual clinical circumstances which may dictate the use of one procedure over the other.

摘要

相似文献

1
A comparison of two conditioning procedures in the use of visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA).
J Speech Hear Disord. 1984 Aug;49(3):241-5. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4903.241.
2
[Visual reinforcement audiometry with different sound stimuli in children].[儿童不同声音刺激下的视觉强化听力测试]
Pro Fono. 2007 Apr-Jun;19(2):185-94. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872007000200007.
3
A comparison of audiometric test methods for 2-year-old children.2岁儿童听力测试方法的比较。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1989 May;54(2):174-9. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5402.174.
4
Effects of reinforcer duration on the response behavior of preterm 2-year-olds in visual reinforcement audiometry.
Ear Hear. 1994 Apr;15(2):161-7. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199404000-00005.
5
Minimal response levels for visual reinforcement audiometry in infants.婴儿视觉强化听力测试的最小反应水平
Int J Audiol. 2003 Oct;42(7):413-7. doi: 10.3109/14992020309080050.
6
Brief clinical report on visual reinforcement audiometry with deaf infants.
J Otolaryngol. 1984 Dec;13(6):367-9.
7
The effect of initial stimulus type for visual reinforcement audiometry.
Int J Audiol. 2004 Apr;43(4):193-7. doi: 10.1080/14992020400050027.
8
Application of visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) to low-functioning children.
J Speech Hear Disord. 1979 Feb;44(1):80-90. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4401.80.
9
A longitudinal study comparing responses of hearing-impaired infants to pure tones using visual reinforcement and play audiometry.一项纵向研究,比较使用视觉强化和游戏测听法的听力受损婴儿对纯音的反应。
Ear Hear. 1987 Jun;8(3):175-9. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198706000-00008.
10
A comparison of some clinical features of visual reinforcement audiometry and the distraction test.
Br J Audiol. 1999 Dec;33(6):355-65. doi: 10.3109/03005364000000104.

引用本文的文献

1
The audiologic assessment of the young pediatric patient: the clinic.小儿患者的听力评估:临床实践
Trends Amplif. 1999 Jun;4(2):51-60. doi: 10.1177/108471389900400205.