Suppr超能文献

长春地辛与顺铂联合化疗与长春地辛单药治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效比较:一项随机研究

Vindesine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy compared with vindesine as a single agent in the management of non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized study.

作者信息

Elliott J A, Ahmedzai S, Hole D, Dorward A J, Stevenson R D, Kaye S B, Banham S W, Stack B H, Calman K C

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1984 Aug;20(8):1025-32. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(84)90104-4.

Abstract

One hundred and five patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer were included in a randomized trial comparing the activity of vindesine as a single agent with the combination of vindesine and cisplatin. All patients were previously untreated and the majority (70%) had squamous carcinoma. The overall partial response rates in 88 evaluable patients were 7% for vindesine alone and 33% for the combined regime. There were no complete responders in either arm. The median survival of patients treated with vindesine and cisplatin was 11 months, compared with 4 months in those treated with vindesine alone (P = 0.008). Patients showing a partial or complete response to vindesine and cisplatin survived a median duration of 13 months, compared with 7 months for non-responders (P = 0.03). This survival benefit associated with the combination was particularly apparent for patients with ECOG performance status 0 or 1 (median survival greater than 18 months and 13 months respectively), locoregional disease (median survival 14 months) and squamous cell histology (median survival 13 months). Myelo-suppression was greater with the combination but was not a major treatment problem. Neurotoxicity, which was frequently dose-limiting, was of similar severity in both treatment groups. The results indicate that the combination of vindesine and cisplatin is superior to vindesine alone for remission induction in non-small cell lung cancer and confers a significant survival advantage compared with vindesine alone in patients with favourable prognostic factors.

摘要

105例无法手术的非小细胞肺癌患者被纳入一项随机试验,该试验比较了长春地辛单药与长春地辛联合顺铂的疗效。所有患者此前均未接受过治疗,大多数(70%)为鳞状细胞癌。88例可评估患者中,长春地辛单药治疗的总体部分缓解率为7%,联合治疗方案的缓解率为33%。两组均无完全缓解者。长春地辛联合顺铂治疗的患者中位生存期为11个月,而长春地辛单药治疗的患者为4个月(P = 0.008)。对长春地辛联合顺铂有部分或完全缓解的患者中位生存期为13个月,无缓解者为7个月(P = 0.03)。这种联合治疗带来的生存益处对于美国东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态为0或1(中位生存期分别大于18个月和13个月)、局部区域疾病(中位生存期14个月)以及鳞状细胞组织学类型(中位生存期13个月)的患者尤为明显。联合治疗的骨髓抑制更严重,但并非主要治疗问题。神经毒性在两个治疗组中严重程度相似,且常为剂量限制性毒性。结果表明,长春地辛联合顺铂在非小细胞肺癌诱导缓解方面优于长春地辛单药,对于具有良好预后因素的患者,与长春地辛单药相比具有显著的生存优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验