• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基因选择小鼠中的特定乙醇戒断性癫痫发作

Specific ethanol withdrawal seizures in genetically selected mice.

作者信息

McSwigan J D, Crabbe J C, Young E R

出版信息

Life Sci. 1984 Nov 19;35(21):2119-26. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(84)90511-3.

DOI:10.1016/0024-3205(84)90511-3
PMID:6541739
Abstract

We are selectively breeding mice prone (WSP) and resistant (WSR) to ethanol withdrawal seizures assessed by handling induced convulsions (HIC). The possibility that differences between the lines in HIC scores are a result of differences in general CNS excitability not specific to ethanol withdrawal was examined. Using treatments which produce generalized seizures (electroconvulsive shock, strychnine, and flurothyl) and gamma amino-butyric acid (GABA) antagonists (picrotoxin, bicuculline, and pentylentetrazol), the ED50 for seizures was determined in the selected lines. In addition, the sensitivity of WSP and WSR mice to the anticonvulsant actions of ethanol against each treatment was determined. Neither the convulsant amperage 50 (CA50) for ECS nor the ED50 for any drug treatment differed for the selected lines. When ethanol (1.5 g/kg) was administered prior to ECS, there was a dramatic differential suppression of ECS in the lines: the CA50 of WSR mice was elevated 5-fold, whereas the CA50 of WSP mice increased only two fold. Ethanol pretreatment also elevated the ED50 for strychnine and flurothyl in WSR mice significantly more than WSP mice, but the line difference was smaller than for the anticonvulsant effect against ECS. The ED50s for the GABA antagonists were not different between the WSR and WSP lines after ethanol pretreatment. We conclude that genetic selection is producing lines of mice that differ specifically in the degree of seizure severity caused by withdrawal from ethanol physical dependence and not in generalized CNS excitability. An increased sensitivity to the anticonvulsant effects of ethanol against some convulsant treatments has appeared as a correlated response to selection in the WSR line.

摘要

我们正在通过处理诱导惊厥(HIC)来选择性培育对乙醇戒断性惊厥易感(WSP)和抗性(WSR)的小鼠。研究了HIC评分在品系间存在差异是否是由非乙醇戒断特异性的一般中枢神经系统兴奋性差异导致的可能性。使用能引发全身性惊厥的处理方法(电惊厥休克、士的宁和氟烷)以及γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)拮抗剂(印防己毒素、荷包牡丹碱和戊四氮),测定了所选品系惊厥的半数有效剂量(ED50)。此外,还测定了WSP和WSR小鼠对乙醇针对每种处理的抗惊厥作用的敏感性。所选品系的电惊厥休克的惊厥电流50(CA50)以及任何药物处理的ED50均无差异。在电惊厥休克前给予乙醇(1.5克/千克)时,品系间对电惊厥休克有显著的差异性抑制:WSR小鼠的CA50升高了5倍,而WSP小鼠的CA50仅升高了两倍。乙醇预处理还使WSR小鼠的士的宁和氟烷的ED50比WSP小鼠显著升高更多,但品系差异小于对电惊厥休克的抗惊厥作用。乙醇预处理后,WSR和WSP品系间GABA拮抗剂的ED50没有差异。我们得出结论,基因选择正在培育出在因乙醇身体依赖戒断引起的惊厥严重程度上存在特异性差异而非一般中枢神经系统兴奋性存在差异的小鼠品系。对乙醇针对某些惊厥处理的抗惊厥作用的敏感性增加已作为对WSR品系选择的相关反应而出现。

相似文献

1
Specific ethanol withdrawal seizures in genetically selected mice.基因选择小鼠中的特定乙醇戒断性癫痫发作
Life Sci. 1984 Nov 19;35(21):2119-26. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(84)90511-3.
2
Chronic ethanol differentially alters susceptibility to chemically induced convulsions in withdrawal seizure-prone and -resistant mice.慢性乙醇对戒断性癫痫发作易感性高和抗性小鼠化学诱导惊厥的易感性有不同影响。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999 Feb;288(2):782-90.
3
Effects of dizocilpine in withdrawal seizure-prone (WSP) and withdrawal seizure-resistant (WSR) mice.地佐环平对戒断性惊厥易感(WSP)和戒断性惊厥抵抗(WSR)小鼠的影响。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1994 Mar;47(3):443-50. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(94)90141-4.
4
Genetic differences in anticonvulsant sensitivity in mouse lines selectively bred for ethanol withdrawal severity.针对乙醇戒断严重程度进行选择性培育的小鼠品系中抗惊厥敏感性的基因差异。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1986 Oct;239(1):154-9.
5
Effects of convulsants on handling-induced convulsions in mice selected for ethanol withdrawal severity.惊厥剂对因乙醇戒断严重程度而挑选出的小鼠处理诱导惊厥的影响。
Brain Res. 1991 May 31;550(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(91)90397-e.
6
Ethanol and diazepam withdrawal convulsions are extensively codetermined in WSP and WSR mice.在WSP和WSR小鼠中,乙醇和地西泮戒断惊厥在很大程度上是共同决定的。
Life Sci. 1989;44(26):2075-80. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(89)90354-8.
7
Sensitivity and tolerance to ethanol in mice bred to be genetically prone or resistant to ethanol withdrawal seizures.对酒精戒断性癫痫具有遗传易感性或抗性的小鼠对乙醇的敏感性和耐受性。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1986 Nov;239(2):327-33.
8
Ethanol and barbiturate withdrawal convulsions are extensively codetermined in mice.
Alcohol. 1988 Mar-Apr;5(2):167-71. doi: 10.1016/0741-8329(88)90015-8.
9
Effects of finasteride on chronic and acute ethanol withdrawal severity in the WSP and WSR selected lines.非那雄胺对WSP和WSR选择品系慢性和急性乙醇戒断严重程度的影响。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005 Jun;29(6):939-48. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000167742.11566.01.
10
Decreased anticonvulsant efficacy of allopregnanolone during ethanol withdrawal in female Withdrawal Seizure-Prone vs. Withdrawal Seizure-Resistant mice.在乙醇戒断期间,与戒断后抗惊厥的雌性小鼠相比,戒断后易惊厥的雌性小鼠中别孕烯醇酮的抗惊厥效力降低。
Neuropharmacology. 2008 Feb;54(2):365-74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2007.10.006. Epub 2007 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Glycine receptor mouse mutants: model systems for human hyperekplexia.甘氨酸受体小鼠突变体:人类惊跳症的模型系统。
Br J Pharmacol. 2013 Nov;170(5):933-52. doi: 10.1111/bph.12335.
2
Behavioral characterization of knockin mice with mutations M287L and Q266I in the glycine receptor α1 subunit.甘氨酸受体 α1 亚单位 M287L 和 Q266I 突变敲入小鼠的行为特征。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2012 Feb;340(2):317-29. doi: 10.1124/jpet.111.185124. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
3
Selective breeding for alcohol withdrawal severity.针对酒精戒断严重程度的选择性育种。
Behav Genet. 1993 Mar;23(2):171-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01067422.
4
Corticosterone increases severity of acute withdrawal from ethanol, pentobarbital, and diazepam in mice.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994 Jun;115(1-2):278-84. doi: 10.1007/BF02244784.
5
Bidirectional selection for susceptibility to ethanol withdrawal seizures in Mus musculus.小家鼠对乙醇戒断性癫痫易感性的双向选择
Behav Genet. 1985 Nov;15(6):521-36. doi: 10.1007/BF01065448.
6
Selected mouse lines, alcohol and behavior.选定的小鼠品系、酒精与行为。
Experientia. 1989 Sep 15;45(9):805-27. doi: 10.1007/BF01954056.