• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[维拉帕米在冠心病患者中的多中心长期研究]

[Multicenter long-term study of gallopamil in patients with coronary heart disease].

作者信息

Sućić M, Schiemann J

出版信息

Arzneimittelforschung. 1984;34(11):1587-94.

PMID:6543136
Abstract

Efficacy and tolerance of gallopamil (Procorum) were investigated over a period of 1 year under practice conditions in a total of 455 patients (254 male, 201 female), aged 62 years (male) and 66 (female) on an average, with electrocardiographically confirmed coronary heart disease. The most frequently applied dosage was 1 film-coated tablet of gallopamil 50 mg 2-3 times daily. Frequency of attacks and nitro consumption as criteria of efficacy decreased by an average of approx. 80% in comparison to the placebo period. Full effectiveness was usually reached 4 weeks after start of therapy. ST-depression under exercise diminished by approx. 50%. An improved exercise tolerance was likewise observed, especially in patients who only tolerated up to 100 Watt prior to therapy. Therapeutic success was defined as good in 73% of the cases, satisfactory in 17.3% and insufficient in 6.7% by the trial physicians - the patient's opinion also being taken into consideration. A decrease of effectiveness was not observed during the one-year therapy. No uniform influence on the laboratory parameters could be revealed. The most frequent side-effects were: gastric discomfort (13 patients), bradycardia (7 patients) and AV-prolongation (3 patients). A total of 77 patients (16.9%) had to discontinue therapy. 29 out of these discontinuations were not therapy-related (drop-outs); 12 were based on an insufficient therapeutic success, 13 on hospitalization, 11 on extracardiac, 4 on cardiac adverse reactions and 8 patients (1.8%) died during the study. In a global assessment the trial physicians described the tolerability as good in 92% of the patients, fair in 2.9% and poor in 2.4%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在实际临床环境中,对455例经心电图确诊为冠心病的患者(男性254例,女性201例,平均年龄男性62岁,女性66岁)进行了为期1年的加洛帕米(Procorum)疗效和耐受性研究。最常用剂量为每日2 - 3次,每次1片50mg薄膜包衣加洛帕米片。与安慰剂期相比,以发作频率和硝酸酯类药物消耗量作为疗效标准,平均降低约80%。治疗开始4周后通常达到完全疗效。运动时ST段压低减少约50%。同样观察到运动耐量有所改善,尤其是治疗前仅能耐受100瓦的患者。试验医生将73%的病例治疗成功定义为良好,17.3%为满意,6.7%为不足,同时也考虑了患者的意见。在一年的治疗期间未观察到疗效下降。未发现对实验室参数有一致影响。最常见的副作用为:胃部不适(13例患者)、心动过缓(7例患者)和房室传导延长(3例患者)。共有77例患者(16.9%)不得不停药。其中29例停药与治疗无关(退出研究);12例基于治疗效果不佳,13例基于住院,11例基于心脏外不良反应,4例基于心脏不良反应,8例患者(1.8%)在研究期间死亡。在总体评估中,试验医生称92%的患者耐受性良好,2.9%为尚可,2.4%为较差。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
[Multicenter long-term study of gallopamil in patients with coronary heart disease].[维拉帕米在冠心病患者中的多中心长期研究]
Arzneimittelforschung. 1984;34(11):1587-94.
2
[Exercise capacity of coronary heart disease patients in long-term follow-up with gallopamil in comparison with premedication with verapamil].[与维拉帕米预处理相比,冠心病患者长期服用加洛帕米后的运动能力随访]
Z Kardiol. 1989;78 Suppl 5:63-8.
3
[Treatment of ischemic heart disease in the elderly. Comparison of diltiazem, verapamil and gallopamil].[老年缺血性心脏病的治疗。地尔硫䓬、维拉帕米和加洛帕米的比较]
Minerva Cardioangiol. 1993 May;41(5):193-204.
4
Efficacy and tolerability of slow-release gallopamil in patients with stable exercise-inducible angina pectoris.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992;20 Suppl 7:S88-94.
5
Administration of gallopamil by long-term venous infusion in spontaneous angina. A single-blind, self-controlled study versus placebo.
Arzneimittelforschung. 1991 Aug;41(8):789-93.
6
[Randomized comparison between gallopamil and diltiazem in angiography verified coronary heart disease].[维拉帕米与地尔硫䓬在血管造影证实的冠心病中的随机对照研究]
Z Kardiol. 1989;78 Suppl 5:94-7.
7
[Acute and long-term effects of gallopamil (D 600) in stable angina pectoris--a randomized double-blind study].
Z Kardiol. 1983 Dec;72(12):746-54.
8
[Therapeutic coronary effectiveness of retard gallopamil following repeated administration in comparison with placebo].与安慰剂相比,多次给药后缓释维拉帕米的冠状动脉治疗效果
Z Kardiol. 1989;78 Suppl 5:89-93.
9
[Anti-angina effect of gallopamil in comparison with another calcium antagonist and a placebo].
Z Kardiol. 1984 Sep;73(9):578-85.
10
Efficacy and tolerability of gallopamil in coronary heart disease: a double blind cross-over comparison with nifedipine.
Eur Heart J. 1992 Apr;13(4):526-30. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060208.