Thormann J, Schwarz F, Ensslen R, Sesto M
Z Kardiol. 1978 May;67(5):328-34.
Under investigation in this study were the relationship between hypersensitive carotid sinus reflex (HCSR) and sick sinus snydrome (SSS), the significance of clinical symptomatology versus electrophysiologic test results and the natural course of both syndromes. In 186 symptomatic patients (pts) resting heart rate, maximal corrected sinus node recovery time (CSRTmax) and maximal carotid sinus pressure results (CSPmax) were determined. According to test results, 103 pts had HCSR (I), 33 had HCSR + SSS (II), 30 pts had SSS (III), and 20 pts with normal test results served as controls (IV). Mean age was the same in groups I--IV (p greater than 0.05). Groups I--III had a heart rate less than or equal to 60 bpm. There was no correlation between patients test data and the occurrence of syncopes in each of groups I--III (p greater than 0.05). In 16 pts with SSS, test results remained unchanged 16 months later (p greater than 0.05). More pts (31%) in group II died in a shorter period of time after pacer application (1.4 +/- 1 year) than pts with AV III degrees block (25%, 1.8 +/- 1.6 years) after pacer application. We conclude that the combination HCSR + SSS seems rather frequent. Specific testing separated HCSR from SSS, but failed to predict syncopes and thereby cannot aid in the indication for pacer application. The 16 months prognosis of SSS proved unfavorable. Mortality after pacer application in HCSR + SSS seems less favorable than in AV III degrees block (p less than 0.05), but depends largely on the severity of associated diseases.
本研究旨在探讨高敏性颈动脉窦反射(HCSR)与病态窦房结综合征(SSS)之间的关系、临床症状与电生理检查结果的意义以及这两种综合征的自然病程。对186例有症状的患者测定了静息心率、最大校正窦房结恢复时间(CSRTmax)和最大颈动脉窦压力结果(CSPmax)。根据检查结果,103例患者有HCSR(I组),33例有HCSR + SSS(II组),30例有SSS(III组),20例检查结果正常的患者作为对照组(IV组)。I - IV组的平均年龄相同(p大于0.05)。I - III组的心率小于或等于60次/分。I - III组中患者的检查数据与晕厥的发生之间无相关性(p大于0.05)。16例SSS患者16个月后检查结果无变化(p大于0.05)。II组中更多患者(31%)在植入起搏器后较短时间内死亡(1.4±1年),而III度房室传导阻滞患者在植入起搏器后死亡时间为(25%,1.8±1.6年)。我们得出结论,HCSR + SSS的组合似乎相当常见。特异性检查可将HCSR与SSS区分开,但无法预测晕厥,因此不能有助于确定起搏器植入的指征。SSS的16个月预后不佳。HCSR + SSS患者植入起搏器后的死亡率似乎比III度房室传导阻滞患者更差(p小于0.05),但很大程度上取决于相关疾病的严重程度。