Suppr超能文献

两种非甾体抗炎药在治疗运动损伤中的疗效差异。

Differential efficacy of two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of sports injuries.

作者信息

Walker J W, VandenBurg M J, Currie W J

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 1984;9(2):119-23. doi: 10.1185/03007998409109569.

Abstract

Twenty-eight patients presenting with sports injuries were randomly allocated to receive either 200 mg sulindac twice daily or 400 mg ibuprofen 3-times daily. Pain symptoms (day and night ratings) and observer assessment of pain on movement, swelling and tenderness were recorded pre-treatment and after 3 and 7 days of therapy. One patient in the sulindac group was excluded from the study because initial symptoms were mild. Response, in terms of decrease in scores, was better in those receiving sulindac than in those given ibuprofen at both 3 and 7 days for the parameters of pain during the day (p less than 0.05 at 7 days) and pain on movement (p less than 0.05 at 3 days). Patient assessment of treatment at 3 and 7 days was significantly better in the sulindac group than in the ibuprofen group (p less than 0.025). The only reported side-effect was gastro-intestinal upset in a patient in the ibuprofen group. The results suggest that sulindac is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for the symptoms associated with sprain and strain injuries.

摘要

28名运动损伤患者被随机分配,分别接受每日两次200毫克舒林酸治疗或每日三次400毫克布洛芬治疗。在治疗前以及治疗3天和7天后,记录疼痛症状(白天和夜间评分)以及观察者对运动时疼痛、肿胀和压痛的评估。舒林酸组有1名患者因初始症状较轻而被排除在研究之外。就评分降低而言,在治疗3天和7天时,接受舒林酸治疗的患者在白天疼痛(7天时p<0.05)和运动时疼痛(3天时p<0.05)参数方面的反应比接受布洛芬治疗的患者更好。在治疗3天和7天时,舒林酸组患者对治疗的评估明显优于布洛芬组(p<0.025)。唯一报告的副作用是布洛芬组1名患者出现胃肠道不适。结果表明,舒林酸是治疗与扭伤和拉伤相关症状的一种有效且耐受性良好的药物。

相似文献

2
A study of sulindac versus ibuprofen in elderly patients with osteoarthritis.
Curr Med Res Opin. 1983;8(5):315-20. doi: 10.1185/03007998309112390.
9
[Sulindac in osteoarthrosis].
Harefuah. 1980 Oct 1;99(7):163-4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验