• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经症与有意识的症状夸大:通过疾病行为问卷进行区分

Neurosis and conscious symptom exaggeration: its differentiation by the Illness Behaviour Questionnaire.

作者信息

Clayer J R, Bookless C, Ross M W

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 1984;28(3):237-41. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(84)90025-4.

DOI:10.1016/0022-3999(84)90025-4
PMID:6545362
Abstract

In an attempt to develop an instrument to differentiate conscious exaggerators of symptoms from normals and neurotics, the Illness Behaviour Questionnaire (IBQ) was administered to 164 members of a public utility, half of whom were instructed to fill it out as conscious exaggerators, and 82 individuals who presented at a hospital pain clinic with pain considered to be neurotically determined. Four IBQ subscales differentiated the three groups, and a new 21-item scale (CE-scale) was developed which achieved wide separation between the conscious exaggerators, neurotics and normals. It is suggested that the CE-scale may have considerable utility in assessing conscious exaggerators and compensation neurotics, and that further studies should assess its predictive value.

摘要

为了研发一种工具,以区分有意识夸大症状者与正常人及神经症患者,对一家公用事业公司的164名员工进行了疾病行为问卷(IBQ)测试,其中一半人被指示作为有意识夸大症状者填写问卷,另外82名在医院疼痛诊所就诊、其疼痛被认为是由神经症决定的个体也参与了测试。IBQ的四个分量表区分了这三组人群,并且开发了一个新的包含21个条目的量表(CE量表),该量表在有意识夸大症状者、神经症患者和正常人之间实现了较大区分。有人认为,CE量表在评估有意识夸大症状者和赔偿性神经症患者方面可能具有相当大的效用,并且进一步的研究应该评估其预测价值。

相似文献

1
Neurosis and conscious symptom exaggeration: its differentiation by the Illness Behaviour Questionnaire.神经症与有意识的症状夸大:通过疾病行为问卷进行区分
J Psychosom Res. 1984;28(3):237-41. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(84)90025-4.
2
'Functional overlay', and illness behaviour in chronic pain: distress or malingering? Conceptual difficulties in medico-legal assessment of personal injury claims.“功能叠加”与慢性疼痛中的患病行为:痛苦还是诈病?人身伤害索赔医学法律评估中的概念难题。
J Psychosom Res. 1995 Aug;39(6):737-53. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(95)00040-p.
3
Accident neurosis revisited.
Br J Psychiatry. 1996 Apr;168(4):399-403. doi: 10.1192/bjp.168.4.399.
4
Measurement of conscious symptom exaggeration by questionnaire: a clinical study.
J Psychosom Res. 1987;31(6):703-11. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(87)90019-5.
5
[Somatoform pain and work capacity].[躯体形式疼痛与工作能力]
Versicherungsmedizin. 1992 Apr 1;44(2):49-53.
6
Abnormal illness behaviour: a 25th anniversary review.异常患病行为:25周年回顾
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1994 Dec;28(4):566-73. doi: 10.1080/00048679409080780.
7
Interrelationship of MMPI-2 validity scales in personal injury claims.
J Clin Psychol. 1995 Jan;51(1):42-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199501)51:1<42::aid-jclp2270510108>3.0.co;2-z.
8
[The so-called "compensation neurosis"--psychopathologic syndrome or obsolete concept?].
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1987 Aug;55(8):249-60. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1001827.
9
Pseudosomatization.
Psychiatr Med. 1992;10(3):93-104.
10
Impact of somatoform symptomatology on credibility of cognitive performance.躯体形式症状学对认知表现可信度的影响。
Clin Neuropsychol. 1999 Nov;13(4):414-9. doi: 10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT414.

引用本文的文献

1
The motor vehicle accident in family practice.家庭医疗中的机动车事故
Can Fam Physician. 1988 Mar;34:589-93.