Waddell J P
Instr Course Lect. 1984;33:179-90.
Primary fixation of displaced subcapital fractures offers a low morbidity and low mortality approach to a very common problem. The vast majority of patients receiving this form of treatment will not require further surgery. When contrasted with the problems of primary arthroplasty which included a higher morbidity and higher mortality, a higher infection rate, and the possibility of prosthetic loosening, prosthetic dislocation, acetabular wear to subsequent pain, and protrusio, the choice seems very clear. We would reserve arthroplasty for the following: Patients with pathologic fractures of the femoral neck secondary to metastatic disease. Patients with displaced fractures of the femoral oral neck who have primary hip disease such as rheumatoid arthritis. Patients with coexistent serious illness with a grossly limited life expectancy. Enfeebled elderly patients with minimal demands (senile, demented, minimal ambulatory or not ambulatory before fracture. (We would not perform primary arthroplasty in patients with neurologic disorder leading to spasticity or contracture, since we found the dislocation rate in such patients to be unacceptably high). In patients under 60 years of age with displaced subcapital fractures of the femoral neck we would advocate the following: Anatomic reduction (open, if necessary); Sound secure fixation; Staged muscle pedicle graft to promote increased fixation and ideally femoral head vascularity; No weight bearing until the fracture unites. In patients greater than 60 years of age we would advocate the following: Anatomic or slight valgus reduction of the fracture; Sound secure fixation; Impaction of the fracture; Weight bearing as tolerated. If these principles are followed, the results of a policy of femoral head preservation in displaced subcapital fractures will be very acceptable for both the patient and surgeon alike. In our opinion, prosthetic replacement equals salvage surgery, and it should be delegated to that role.
对移位的股骨颈基底骨折进行一期固定,为解决这一常见问题提供了一种低发病率和低死亡率的方法。绝大多数接受这种治疗方式的患者无需进一步手术。与一期关节成形术的问题相比,后者包括更高的发病率和死亡率、更高的感染率,以及假体松动、假体脱位、髋臼磨损导致后续疼痛和髋臼内陷的可能性,选择似乎非常明确。我们将关节成形术保留给以下患者:继发于转移性疾病的股骨颈病理性骨折患者。患有原发性髋部疾病(如类风湿性关节炎)的股骨颈基底移位骨折患者。患有并存严重疾病且预期寿命明显受限的患者。需求极少的衰弱老年患者(老年、痴呆、骨折前活动极少或不能活动)。(对于因神经系统疾病导致痉挛或挛缩的患者,我们不会进行一期关节成形术,因为我们发现这类患者的脱位率高得令人无法接受)。对于60岁以下股骨颈基底移位骨折的患者,我们提倡以下做法:解剖复位(必要时切开复位);可靠稳固的固定;分阶段进行带肌蒂移植以增强固定并理想地增加股骨头血运;骨折愈合前不负重。对于60岁以上的患者,我们提倡以下做法:骨折解剖复位或轻度外翻复位;可靠稳固的固定;骨折嵌插;根据耐受情况负重。如果遵循这些原则,对于移位的股骨颈基底骨折采取保留股骨头策略的结果,对患者和外科医生来说都将是非常令人满意的。我们认为,假体置换等同于挽救手术,应将其限定在这一角色。