Brodovsky H S, Bauer M, Horton J, Elson P J
Cancer. 1984 Feb 15;53(4):844-52. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840215)53:4<844::aid-cncr2820530405>3.0.co;2-n.
Melphalan (L-PAM) was compared to (C) cyclophosphamide, (M) methotrexate, and (F) 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in 413 patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. L-PAM was given 3.5 mg/m2 twice daily for 5 days every 5 weeks. CMF doses were: C, 400 mg/m2; M, 15 mg/m2; and F, 400 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 every 28 days. Three hundred seventy-five patients have been analyzed (L-PAM, 190; CMF, 185). One hundred fifty-three patients (41%) had measurable disease, 109 (29%) had evaluable disease, and 113 (30%) had nonmeasurable, nonevaluable disease. Response rates for patients with measurable and evaluable disease combined were similar: L-PAM, 32/130 (24%) (15% complete response); CMF, 47/132 (35%) (18% complete response). Patients with Stage IV measurable disease had a greater response rate to CMF, 22/52 (42%) versus L-PAM, 6/39 (15%). Survival and time to treatment failure were similar for both treatment regimens. Survival was improved in responders. Medians are: complete response, 28.1 months; partial response, 12.3 months; and no response, 6.7 months. Disease stage, performance status and age were identified as important prognostic variables for both survival and time to treatment failure.
对413例晚期卵巢癌患者的美法仑(左旋苯丙氨酸氮芥,L-PAM)与环磷酰胺(C)、甲氨蝶呤(M)及5-氟尿嘧啶(F)(CMF方案)进行了比较。L-PAM的给药剂量为3.5mg/m²,每日2次,共5天,每5周重复。CMF方案的剂量为:C,400mg/m²;M,15mg/m²;F,400mg/m²,静脉注射,于第1天和第8天给药,每28天重复。已对375例患者进行了分析(L-PAM组190例;CMF组185例)。153例患者(41%)有可测量病灶,109例(29%)有可评估病灶,113例(30%)有不可测量、不可评估病灶。可测量和可评估病灶患者的联合缓解率相似:L-PAM组,32/130例(24%)(15%为完全缓解);CMF组,47/132例(35%)(18%为完全缓解)。IV期有可测量病灶的患者对CMF的缓解率更高,为22/52例(42%),而L-PAM组为6/39例(15%)。两种治疗方案的生存率和至治疗失败时间相似。缓解者的生存率有所提高。中位数分别为:完全缓解28.1个月;部分缓解12.3个月;未缓解6.7个月。疾病分期、体能状态和年龄被确定为生存和至治疗失败时间的重要预后变量。