Wiley K
Nurs Res. 1983 May-Jun;32(3):181-5.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of preference for structure and a self-directed learning (SDL) project on the SDL readiness of junior-class baccalaureate nursing students. The sample was divided into a control group consisting of two sections (N = 50) who did not conduct an SDL project, and an experimental group consisting of two sections (N = 54) who did conduct an SDL project. Preference for structure was measured by Ginther's Reactions to Statements; SDL readiness was measured by Guglielmino's Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale (SDLRS). Before treatment, both groups of students and both groups of faculty were similar on these research variables. Data were analyzed by multiple regression analysis of covariance, with pretest SDLRS scores as the covariate. It was concluded that neither preference for structure nor conducting an SDL project contributed significantly to the variance in posttest SDL readiness, but the interaction of these two variables did contribute. The findings suggest that persons who prefer low structure benefit from SDL teaching more than do persons who prefer high structure.
本研究的目的是探讨结构偏好和自主学习(SDL)项目对低年级本科护理专业学生SDL准备度的影响。样本分为对照组(由两个班级组成,N = 50,未开展SDL项目)和实验组(由两个班级组成,N = 54,开展了SDL项目)。结构偏好通过金瑟的陈述反应量表进行测量;SDL准备度通过古列尔米诺的自主学习准备度量表(SDLRS)进行测量。在进行干预前,两组学生和两组教师在这些研究变量上相似。数据采用协方差多元回归分析进行分析,将预测试SDLRS分数作为协变量。研究得出结论,结构偏好和开展SDL项目均未对后测SDL准备度的方差产生显著影响,但这两个变量的交互作用确实有影响。研究结果表明,偏好低结构的人比偏好高结构的人从SDL教学中获益更多。