Kleinfeld M J, Boal B H
Cardiology. 1978;63(4):193-8. doi: 10.1159/000169897.
In 21 patients with and 31 without junctional escape beats, a comparison of the symptoms, revealed that there were no significant differences (p greater than 0.05) in the symptoms between these two groups manifesting a sick sinus syndrome. Thus, the occurrence of junctional escape beats did not provide the anticipated shortening of the asystolic pauses to prevent the occurrence of symptoms related to the period of electrical silence. In 7 patients with an escape junctional rhythm, the long pause was interrupted by the occurrence of a regular junctional rhythm. The pause was not preceded by a supraventricular tachycardia, ruling out physiologic overdrive suppression of the junctional pacemaker. The period of asystole preceding the junctional rhythm was not multiple of the R-R interval of the junctional rhythm. 4 additional patients demonstrated long periods of asystole, uninterrupted by junctional escape beats and at other times exhibited shorter pauses which were terminated by junctional escape beats. These findings can be explained by the presence of a 'junctional arrest' which is analogous to sinoatrial arrest. The phenomenon of 'junctional arrest' may be one tenable explanation to account for the lack of protection by junctional escape activity against the symptoms associated with the sick sinus syndrome.
在21例有交界性逸搏心律和31例无交界性逸搏心律的患者中,对症状进行比较,结果显示这两组表现为病态窦房结综合征的患者在症状方面无显著差异(p大于0.05)。因此,交界性逸搏心律的出现并未如预期那样缩短心脏停搏期,以防止与电静止期相关症状的发生。在7例有逸搏性交界性心律的患者中,长间歇被规则的交界性心律打断。该间歇之前没有室上性心动过速,排除了交界性起搏器的生理性超速抑制。交界性心律之前的心脏停搏期不是交界性心律R-R间期的倍数。另外4例患者表现出长时间的心脏停搏,未被交界性逸搏心律打断,而在其他时候则表现出较短的间歇,这些间歇由交界性逸搏心律终止。这些发现可以用类似于窦性停搏的“交界性停搏”来解释。“交界性停搏”现象可能是解释交界性逸搏活动未能预防病态窦房结综合征相关症状的一个合理原因。