Young L, Michel J D, Moore D J
J Prosthet Dent. 1983 May;49(5):690-4. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90398-0.
All Vitallium subperiosteal mandibular implants placed at UMKC from 1955 to 1975 were reevaluated from four objective and subjective standpoints. It can be concluded that (1) the UMKC implants surpass the 5- and 10-year longevity standards of the Harvard Conference on Dental Implants; (2) periodic recall is an important part of an implant program; (3) acute inflammation is prevalent among implant patients; (4) surgical removal of part of an implant framework can be preventive treatment and prolong the life of the implant; (5) all but one of the implants reviewed were successful to a degree; (6) unilateral anesthesia or paresthesia can be expected in approximately 50% of patients; (7) anesthesia was not a deterrent to success in this study; (8) satisfaction with the implants was absolute; and (9) if removal of an implant was necessary, patients requested replacement if possible.
对1955年至1975年间在密苏里大学堪萨斯城分校植入的所有维他灵骨膜下下颌植入物，从四个客观和主观角度进行了重新评估。可以得出以下结论：（1）密苏里大学堪萨斯城分校的植入物超过了哈佛种植牙会议的5年和10年使用寿命标准；（2）定期回访是植入计划的重要组成部分；（3）植入患者中急性炎症很普遍；（4）手术切除部分植入框架可以作为预防性治疗并延长植入物的使用寿命；（5）除一枚植入物外，其他所有植入物在一定程度上都是成功的；（6）约50%的患者可能会出现单侧麻醉或感觉异常；（7）在本研究中，麻醉并非成功的阻碍因素；（8）对植入物的满意度是绝对的；（9）如果有必要取出植入物，患者如有可能会要求更换。
