• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于噻吗洛尔在心肌梗死后二级预防中的多中心研究。

A multicenter study on timolol in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction.

出版信息

Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1983;674:1-129.

PMID:6580807
Abstract

Patients who survive the acute phase of myocardial infarction have a high mortality in the following years. The mortality is largely due to sudden cardiac death or recurrent myocardial infarction. The main purpose of the present study was to clarify whether long-term treatment with the beta-adrenergic blocking agent timolol would improve prognosis in such patients. In order to recruit the sufficient number of patients to resolve this question a multicenter study was performed. This study, named "The Norwegian Multicenter Study On Timolol After Myocardial Infarction" was designed as a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Twenty hospitals in Norway collaborated within an organizational structure aiming to achieve a maximum of standardization of study procedures. From a representative population of patients less than 75 years of age surviving the acute episode of infarction 52% were recruited for the study. The recruitment rate was high at all hospitals. The 1884 patients included were stratified into 3 risk groups before randomization. Risk Group I (18%) were patients with a recurrent infarction. Risk Group II (58%) were patients with a first infarction considered to be at high risk of sudden cardiac death. The rest, Risk Group III (22%) were patients at low risk. The placebo and timolol groups were similar with respect to most of the important baseline characteristics. Minor differences in a few characteristics did not affect the overall results as was shown by various statistical procedures including the Cox's proportional hazards regression model. The patients were followed 12 - 33 months after discharge from hospital with regular clinical examinations performed by the study investigators at the hospitals. Compliance was very good and no patient was lost to follow-up although 23.3% in the placebo group and 29.1% in the timolol group were withdrawn from the study regimen. The study demonstrated that long-term treatment with timolol improved prognosis in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. The most important finding was a highly statistically significant difference in life table mortality of 39.3% between the placebo group (21.9%) and the timolol group (13.3%) (p=0.0003). This difference was first of all due to a lower rate of sudden cardiac death in the timolol group (7.7%) compared to the placebo group (13.9%) (p=0.0001) when including events in the so-called "per protocol period".(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

心肌梗死急性期存活的患者在接下来的几年中死亡率很高。死亡率主要归因于心脏性猝死或复发性心肌梗死。本研究的主要目的是阐明β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂噻吗洛尔的长期治疗是否会改善此类患者的预后。为了招募足够数量的患者来解决这个问题,开展了一项多中心研究。这项名为“挪威心肌梗死后噻吗洛尔多中心研究”的研究被设计为一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。挪威的20家医院在一个旨在实现研究程序最大程度标准化的组织结构内进行合作。在年龄小于75岁且存活过梗死急性期的代表性患者群体中,52%被招募参加该研究。所有医院的招募率都很高。纳入的1884例患者在随机分组前被分为3个风险组。风险组I(18%)为复发性梗死患者。风险组II(58%)为首次梗死且被认为有高心脏性猝死风险的患者。其余的风险组III(22%)为低风险患者。安慰剂组和噻吗洛尔组在大多数重要的基线特征方面相似。少数特征的微小差异并未影响总体结果,各种统计程序(包括Cox比例风险回归模型)都表明了这一点。患者出院后被随访12 - 33个月,由医院的研究调查人员进行定期临床检查。依从性非常好,没有患者失访,尽管安慰剂组有23.3%、噻吗洛尔组有29.1%的患者退出了研究方案。该研究表明,噻吗洛尔的长期治疗改善了急性心肌梗死幸存者的预后。最重要的发现是,安慰剂组(21.9%)和噻吗洛尔组(13.3%)的生命表死亡率在统计学上有高度显著差异(39.3%)(p = 0.0003)。当纳入所谓“符合方案期”的事件时,这种差异首先是由于噻吗洛尔组(7.7%)的心脏性猝死发生率低于安慰剂组(13.9%)(p = 0.0001)。(摘要截断于400字)

相似文献

1
A multicenter study on timolol in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction.一项关于噻吗洛尔在心肌梗死后二级预防中的多中心研究。
Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1983;674:1-129.
2
The Norwegian Multicenter Study of Timolol after Myocardial Infarction.挪威心肌梗死后噻吗洛尔多中心研究
Circulation. 1983 Jun;67(6 Pt 2):I49-53.
3
[Timolol reduces mortality and reinfarct in patients surviving an acute myocardial infarct. The Norwegian Multicenter Study Group].噻吗洛尔降低急性心肌梗死存活患者的死亡率和再梗死率。挪威多中心研究小组
MMW Munch Med Wochenschr. 1981 May 29;123(22):929-38.
4
Six-year follow-up of the Norwegian Multicenter Study on Timolol after Acute Myocardial Infarction.挪威急性心肌梗死后噻吗洛尔多中心研究的六年随访
N Engl J Med. 1985 Oct 24;313(17):1055-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198510243131705.
5
Secondary prevention of myocardial infarction in the elderly.老年人心肌梗死的二级预防
Curr Med Res Opin. 1982;7(Suppl 1):68-78.
6
The Timolol Myocardial Infarction Study: an evaluation of selected variables.噻吗洛尔心肌梗死研究:对选定变量的评估。
Circulation. 1983 Jun;67(6 Pt 2):I101-6.
7
The German-Austrian aspirin trial: a comparison of acetylsalicylic acid, placebo and phenprocoumon in secondary prevention of myocardial infarction. On behalf of the German-Austrian Study Group.德奥阿司匹林试验:乙酰水杨酸、安慰剂和苯丙香豆素在心肌梗死二级预防中的比较。代表德奥研究小组。
Circulation. 1980 Dec;62(6 Pt 2):V63-72.
8
Beta blockade after myocardial infarction: the Norwegian propranolol study in high-risk patients.心肌梗死后的β受体阻滞剂治疗:挪威高危患者普萘洛尔研究
Circulation. 1983 Jun;67(6 Pt 2):I57-60.
9
European Infarction Study (E.I.S.). A secondary prevention study with slow release oxprenolol after myocardial infarction: morbidity and mortality.欧洲心肌梗死研究(E.I.S.)。一项关于心肌梗死后使用氧烯洛尔缓释剂的二级预防研究:发病率和死亡率。
Eur Heart J. 1984 Mar;5(3):189-202.
10
Oxprenolol in myocardial infarction survivors: brief review of the European Infarction Study results in the light of other beta-blocker post infarction trials.心得平用于心肌梗死幸存者:结合其他β受体阻滞剂心肌梗死后试验对欧洲梗死研究结果的简要综述。
Z Kardiol. 1985;74 Suppl 6:165-72.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Management for Survivors of Sudden Cardiac Death.心脏性猝死幸存者的临床管理
Perm J. 2001 Winter;5(1):18-32. doi: 10.7812/TPP/01.998.