Refsum H, Passwal M, Olsson S O
Eur J Pharmacol. 1978 Jun 1;49(3):285-93. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(78)90104-8.
The effects of the two neuroleptics, melperone (a butyrophenone) and thioridazine (a phenothiazine), were compared on the electrical and mechanical activity of isolated rat atria. Both electrically stimulated and spontaneously beating atria were used. Melperone was found to prolong the effective refractory period while the threshold for electrical stimulation i.e. the excitability, was almost unaffected. Thioridazine caused a similar prolongation of the effective refractory period, but also decreased the excitability significantly. In contrast to melperone, thioridazine had a negative inotropic effect. The spontaneous pacemaker activity was depressed and the sinus node recovery time increased to a greater extent after melperone than after thioridazine. The results taken together with other recent data support the hypothesis that melperone may be a type III anti-arrhythmic according to the classification of Vaughan Williams, in contrast to thioridazine which has a quinidine-like action (type I). The results also indicate that melperone in addition to prolonging the effective refractory period, may act as an anti-arrhythmic agent by depressing automaticity.
比较了两种抗精神病药物美哌隆(一种丁酰苯类药物)和硫利达嗪(一种吩噻嗪类药物)对离体大鼠心房电活动和机械活动的影响。使用了电刺激的心房和自发搏动的心房。发现美哌隆可延长有效不应期,而电刺激阈值即兴奋性几乎未受影响。硫利达嗪引起类似的有效不应期延长,但也显著降低了兴奋性。与美哌隆不同,硫利达嗪具有负性肌力作用。美哌隆使自发起搏活动受到抑制,且窦房结恢复时间比硫利达嗪引起的延长程度更大。这些结果与其他近期数据共同支持这样的假说:根据 Vaughan Williams 分类,美哌隆可能是 III 类抗心律失常药物,而硫利达嗪具有类似奎尼丁的作用(I 类)。结果还表明,美哌隆除延长有效不应期外,可能通过抑制自律性而作为抗心律失常药物发挥作用。