Findlay G, McFadzean R M, Teasdale G
Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K (1962). 1983;103 ( Pt 2):212-6.
The lack of a standard, quantitative method of assessing the degree of visual deficit hinders comparison of the results of the different methods available for treating visual failure due to pituitary tumour. This report describes a simple, semi-quantitative and precise approach and illustrates its use in 34 patients treated by transsphenoidal hypophysectomy and radiotherapy. Visual improvement occurred in 85 per cent of cases and no patient sustained deterioration of vision. The degree of pre-operative visual loss was scored at a mean of 51.4 per cent which reduced to a mean of 27.4 per cent at a minimum of twelve months' follow up. The factor that had the greatest influence on visual recovery was the degree of visual loss on presentation. It is therefore essential to be able to compare this variable before attempting to assess if outcome is different in a series treated by alternative methods.
缺乏一种评估视力缺损程度的标准定量方法,阻碍了对因垂体瘤导致视力减退的不同治疗方法的结果进行比较。本报告描述了一种简单、半定量且精确的方法,并举例说明了其在34例经蝶窦垂体切除术和放射治疗的患者中的应用。85%的病例视力得到改善,没有患者视力持续恶化。术前视力丧失程度平均评分为51.4%,在至少十二个月的随访中降至平均27.4%。对视力恢复影响最大的因素是就诊时的视力丧失程度。因此,在试图评估采用替代方法治疗的一系列病例的结果是否不同之前,能够比较这一变量至关重要。