Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
A duty to science.对科学的责任。
Fed Proc. 1978 Jul;37(9):2211.
2
Letter: Peer review.信件：同行评审。
Fed Proc. 1974 Jun;33(6):1679.
3
The scientist's duty to contribute to the formation of public policy.科学家有责任为公共政策的形成做出贡献。
Am J Pharm Sci Support Public Health. 1975 Mar-Apr;147(2):56-9.
4
5
Science and government. Science and the candidates.科学与政府。科学与候选人。
Science. 2008 Apr 11;320(5873):182. doi: 10.1126/science.1158281.
6
Participation of biologists in the formulation of national science policy.
Fed Proc. 1976 Jul;35(9):1957-62.
7
Shovel-ready science?准备就绪的科学？
Science. 2009 Mar 27;323(5922):1646. doi: 10.1126/science.1173327.
8
U.S. science budget. Science agencies caught in postelection spending squeeze.美国科学预算。科学机构陷入选举后支出紧缩困境。
Science. 2004 Dec 3;306(5702):1662-3. doi: 10.1126/science.306.5702.1662.
9
United States Department of Agriculture statement of Assistant Secretary for Science and Education before the House Committee on Science and Technology, July 23, 1986, Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight and Subcommittee on Science, Research and Technology and Subcommittee on Natural Resources, Agricultural Research and Environment.
Recomb DNA Tech Bull. 1986 Sep;9(3):186-94.
10
U.S. budget 2009. A science budget of choices and chances.2009年美国预算。一个充满选择与机遇的科学预算。
Science. 2008 Feb 8;319(5864):714-5. doi: 10.1126/science.319.5864.714.
Zotero 插件