Geschwind N
Fed Proc. 1978 Jul;37(9):2263-6.
Despite repeated assertions by some critics of the impossibility of linking behaviour to study of the brain, there have been major, although not always continuous advances in this field over the past 100 years, some of them based on simple techniques. One example is the study of cerebral dominance, for which it was believed until quite recently that no anatomical basis had been specified. The paper summarizes the findings of striking anatomical asymmetry of the upper surface of the temporal lobe, in an area known to be involved in speech functions. Asymmetries observed in autopsy brains of adults and fetuses, both by gross and by cytoarchitectonic techniques, are reported. By use of radiological methods asymmetries have been shown in the brains and skills of living persons. Asymmetries also appear to be present in the endocasts of skulls of ancient humans, and in nonhuman primates. The distribution of asymmetries is different in left and right handers. The implications of these findings are discussed.
尽管一些批评者再三断言行为与大脑研究之间不可能建立联系,但在过去100年里,该领域还是取得了重大进展,虽然并非一直持续不断,其中一些进展基于简单的技术。一个例子是大脑优势研究,直到最近人们还认为该研究没有明确的解剖学基础。本文总结了颞叶上表面显著的解剖学不对称性的研究结果,该区域已知与语言功能有关。报告了通过大体和细胞构筑学技术在成人和胎儿的尸检大脑中观察到的不对称性。通过放射学方法,已在活体的大脑和技能中显示出不对称性。古代人类颅骨的内模以及非人类灵长类动物中似乎也存在不对称性。左撇子和右撇子的不对称性分布有所不同。本文还讨论了这些发现的意义。