Chaconas S J, Caputo A A, Harvey K
Am J Orthod. 1984 Jun;85(6):494-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(84)90089-7.
Applications of open coil springs in orthodontic tooth movement are many and varied. Current descriptions of force production by open coil springs are based upon force values produced in series of discrete compression tests. It was the purpose of this study to analyze and compare open-coil-spring force production from continuous load-deflection curves, thereby assisting the clinician in the selection of the ideal spring for a given application. Load-deflection curves were generated for open coil springs of various wire diameters and lumen sizes, as well as four wire alloys from three manufactures. Testing was performed on an Instron test machine using 0.016 inch round and 0.018 by 0.022 inch rectangular arch wires. With a constant lumen size, an increase in wire size produced an increase in force at a given activation. With a constant wire size, an increase in lumen size produced a decrease in force at a given activation. The effect of the arch wire size and shape was not significantly different for the coil springs with the smaller lumen sizes. For the larger lumen sizes, the springs used with the rectangular arch wire manifested a greater linear range than those used with the smaller arch wire. The difference between the load-deflection characteristics of the coil springs from different manufacturers was attributed to the difference in the pitch of the coils.
开圈弹簧在正畸牙齿移动中的应用多种多样。目前对开圈弹簧力产生的描述是基于一系列离散压缩试验中产生的力值。本研究的目的是通过连续的载荷-挠度曲线分析和比较开圈弹簧的力产生情况,从而帮助临床医生为特定应用选择理想的弹簧。针对不同线径、管腔尺寸的开圈弹簧以及来自三个制造商的四种线材合金生成了载荷-挠度曲线。使用0.016英寸圆形和0.018×0.022英寸矩形弓丝在英斯特朗试验机上进行测试。在管腔尺寸恒定的情况下,线径增加会在给定激活状态下使力增加。在钢丝尺寸恒定的情况下,管腔尺寸增加会在给定激活状态下使力减小。对于管腔尺寸较小的开圈弹簧,弓丝尺寸和形状的影响没有显著差异。对于管腔尺寸较大的弹簧,与矩形弓丝一起使用的弹簧比与较小弓丝一起使用的弹簧表现出更大的线性范围。不同制造商的开圈弹簧载荷-挠度特性之间的差异归因于弹簧圈节距的不同。