Suppr超能文献

对流免疫电泳与间接血凝试验在检测实验感染各种种类蛔虫的家兔抗体中的比较。

Comparison of counterimmunoelectrophoresis with indirect haemagglutination test in the detection of antibodies in rabbits experimentally infected with various species of ascarids.

作者信息

Lukes S, Prokopic J

出版信息

Folia Parasitol (Praha). 1984;31(2):157-62.

PMID:6589203
Abstract

Counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIEP) and indirect haemagglutination (IHA) were used for the detection of antibodies in 437 sera of rabbits experimentally infected with Ascaris suum, Toxocara canis and Toxascaris leonina. CIEP showed 44.0-52.3% positivity in A. suum, 25.5% in T. canis and 19.7-29.2% in T. leonina infection, whereas the positivity detected by IHA was 59.8-90.2% in A. suum, 44.8% in T. canis and 59.6% in T. leonina infection. A comparison of the two tests reveals that CIEP is a suitable, rapid and simple method for orientation examinations in ascarid infections.

摘要

采用对流免疫电泳(CIEP)和间接血凝试验(IHA)检测437份经实验感染猪蛔虫、犬弓首蛔虫和狮弓蛔虫的兔血清中的抗体。CIEP检测显示,猪蛔虫感染的阳性率为44.0 - 52.3%,犬弓首蛔虫感染为25.5%,狮弓蛔虫感染为19.7 - 29.2%;而IHA检测的阳性率在猪蛔虫感染中为59.8 - 90.2%,犬弓首蛔虫感染为44.8%,狮弓蛔虫感染为59.6%。两种检测方法的比较表明,CIEP是一种适用于蛔虫感染初筛的简便快速方法。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验