Pancherz H, Hansen K
Am J Orthod. 1984 Nov;86(5):427-34. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9416(84)90036-8.
This investigation was undertaken to examine the effects of the registration error of the nasion-sella reference line (NSL) upon the values of angular and linear head film measurements. A comparison was made between two methods of constructing the NSL: (1) using the anatomically defined landmarks nasion and sella (L method) and (2) using the stable skull structures in the anterior cranial base (S method). Double registrations of sixteen pairs of lateral head films, from before and after 3 years of activator treatment, were performed by two observers. The results of the investigation revealed the following: (1) The registration error of the NSL affected angular and linear head film measures to a considerable degree. (2) The registration error was larger for the S method than for the L method. (3) The two observers differed in locating the NSL. The interobserver difference was especially apparent for the S method. The clinician should be aware of the NSL-registration error in the analysis of both single and serial radiographs. A misjudgment of the position of the reference line may result in diagnostic misinterpretations, thus affecting treatment planning or leading to false conclusions when the outcome of a particular treatment procedure is evaluated. In longitudinal studies covering a short period of growth, the L method would be the method of choice.
本研究旨在探讨鼻根点 - 蝶鞍参考线(NSL)的定位误差对头颅侧位片角度和线性测量值的影响。对构建NSL的两种方法进行了比较:(1)使用解剖学定义的标志点鼻根点和蝶鞍(L法);(2)使用前颅底稳定的颅骨结构(S法)。由两名观察者对16对激活器治疗3年前后的头颅侧位片进行了双重定位。研究结果如下:(1)NSL的定位误差对头颅侧位片的角度和线性测量有相当程度的影响。(2)S法的定位误差大于L法。(3)两名观察者在确定NSL位置时存在差异。观察者间差异在S法中尤为明显。临床医生在分析单张和系列X线片时应意识到NSL定位误差。参考线位置判断错误可能导致诊断错误,从而影响治疗计划,或在评估特定治疗程序的结果时得出错误结论。在涵盖短期生长的纵向研究中,L法将是首选方法。