Ashkenaz P J
Dent Clin North Am. 1984 Oct;28(4):853-63.
I would like to conclude with some personal observations and comments on the use of single-visit endodontics in private practice based on my 12 years of experience utilizing this procedure. I cannot stress in strong enough terms that one-visit endodontics should not be undertaken by the novice. As an evolutionary philosophy of treatment, its use grows out of a full understanding of fundamental endodontic principles by the experienced practitioner. It is only after considering all of the indications and contraindications in each case on an individual basis, that a decision should be made as to whether or not it can be completed in a single visit. However, it is also important for the practitioner to have a clinical sense of what can be accomplished once the rubber dam has been placed and work commenced on the tooth. I submit to you that this very important clinical sense can be gained only after many years of clinical experience. Therefore, the endodontic competence of the practicing dentist becomes the overriding factor in determining the outcome of any one particular case. This is not to say that only a specialized few can and should perform this procedure. However, it does mean that a high degree of clinical skill is necessary to perform it in a successful manner. The performance of better endodontics in multiple visits will ensure success in single visits. Therefore, it is incumbent upon the individual practitioner to objectively evaluate his or her endodontic skills. The clinician should critically evaluate every aspect of his or her endodontic practice by determining the incidences of biomechanical errors such as ledging, perforations, overinstrumentation, broken instruments, interappointment flare-ups, and failures. For only after evaluating these areas will the clinician have an indication as to his or her level of endodontic skill and whether or not future study and practice need be done in one or more specific aspects of endodontic practice. Once a high level of competence is attained, one-visit endodontics can be successfully performed if well-skilled clinicians choose their cases carefully and adhere to basic endodontic principles.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
基于我12年运用单次就诊根管治疗术的经验,我想就其在私人诊所的应用分享一些个人观察与看法。我再怎么强调都不为过,新手不应尝试单次就诊根管治疗术。作为一种不断发展的治疗理念,其应用源于经验丰富的从业者对根管治疗基本原理的充分理解。只有在逐一考虑每个病例的所有适应证和禁忌证之后,才能决定是否可以在单次就诊时完成治疗。然而,对于从业者来说,在放置橡皮障并开始对牙齿进行治疗后,对能够完成的治疗有临床判断也很重要。我认为,这种非常重要的临床判断力只有在多年的临床经验之后才能获得。因此,执业牙医的根管治疗能力成为决定任何一个特定病例治疗结果的首要因素。这并不是说只有少数专业人士能够且应该进行这个治疗程序。然而,这确实意味着要成功进行该治疗需要高度的临床技能。多次就诊时进行更好的根管治疗将确保单次就诊时的成功。因此,每个从业者都有责任客观评估自己的根管治疗技能。临床医生应该通过确定诸如台阶形成、穿孔、过度预备、器械折断、复诊间疼痛和治疗失败等生物力学错误的发生率,来严格评估其根管治疗实践的各个方面。因为只有在评估这些方面之后,临床医生才能了解自己的根管治疗技能水平,以及是否需要在根管治疗实践的一个或多个特定方面进行进一步的学习和实践。一旦达到了较高的技能水平,如果技术娴熟的临床医生仔细选择病例并遵循基本的根管治疗原则,单次就诊根管治疗术就能成功实施。(摘要截断于400字)