Danchin N, David P, Bourassa M G
Eur Heart J. 1983 Oct;4(10):687-90. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061379.
Work status was studied in 76 male patients under the age of 60, who had been randomly assigned to surgical or medical treatment for coronary artery disease with relatively stable angina (Class I or II NYHA) One year after catheterization or surgery, there were as many patients employed in the medical (84%) as in the surgical (81%) groups, despite a marked improvement of functional symptoms in the latter group; 8% in surgical patients and 11% in medical patients were on social welfare. Surgery did not improve work resumption in patients who had been unemployed for seven months or more before inclusion into the study (71%, versus 67% in medical patients). It is concluded that aorto-coronary bypass surgery cannot be considered as a measure of vocational rehabilitation sufficient to improve employment in patients with mild stable angina, when compared to medical treatment.
对76名60岁以下的男性患者的工作状况进行了研究,这些患者因相对稳定型心绞痛(纽约心脏病协会I级或II级)被随机分配接受冠状动脉疾病的手术治疗或药物治疗。在导管插入术或手术后一年,药物治疗组(84%)和手术治疗组(81%)中就业的患者数量相同,尽管后一组的功能症状有明显改善;手术患者中有8%、药物治疗患者中有11%领取社会福利。对于入组研究前已失业七个月或更长时间的患者,手术并未改善其恢复工作的情况(71%,而药物治疗患者为67%)。得出的结论是,与药物治疗相比,对于轻度稳定型心绞痛患者,不能将主动脉冠状动脉搭桥手术视为足以改善就业的职业康复措施。