Genovesi E V, Pettey C L, Collins J J
Cancer Res. 1984 Apr;44(4):1489-98.
Previous studies have demonstrated that spleen cells from DBA/2 mice protected against challenge with a leukemogenic dose of Friend leukemia virus (FLV) by passive administration of xenogeneic antiviral or anti-FLV Mr 71,000 viral envelope glycoprotein antisera can adoptively transfer antiviral resistance to unimmunized irradiated syngeneic recipients. In addition, elimination of T-cells by treatment with anti-Thy 1.2 antibodies plus complement had no effect on the ability of spleen cells from serum-protected mice to adoptively transfer antiviral resistance. We now show that similar depletion of B-cells with rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin G plus complement or macrophages by adherence to Sephadex G-10 columns also leaves intact the protective capacity of spleen cells from serum-protected mice. That these results reflect the ability of more than one spleen cell population to transfer antiviral resistance rather than the activity of a non-T, non-B, nonmacrophage cell compartment is supported by the finding that purified splenic T- or B-cells alone from serum-protected DBA/2 mice can adoptively transfer antiviral resistance. Given the previously reported effects of sublethal irradiation on FLV leukemogenesis which could potentially complicate the interpretation of adoptive transfer experiments carried out in this system, analogous studies were performed using a Winn-type assay in which putative effector cells were preincubated with virus before inoculation of the mixture in unirradiated mice. These Winn assay experiments yielded identical results in that serum-protected spleen cells again prevented viral leukemogenesis, and the separate elimination of T-cells, B-cells, or macrophages had no effect on their protective activity. In addition, mixed transfer of serum-protected and normal spleen cells also protected irradiated mice against FLV challenge, providing further evidence that this adoptive protection truly reflects the presence of virus-specific effector cells in the spleens of serum-protected mice and not an inability of these spleen cells to replace radiation-sensitive viral target cells in recipient animals, since these should be supplied by the normal spleen cells in the transferred mixture.
先前的研究表明,通过被动给予异种抗病毒血清或抗Friend白血病病毒(FLV)分子量为71,000的病毒包膜糖蛋白抗血清,DBA/2小鼠的脾细胞可保护其免受致白血病剂量的FLV攻击,且能将抗病毒抗性过继转移给未免疫的经照射的同基因受体。此外,用抗Thy 1.2抗体加补体处理以消除T细胞,对血清保护小鼠的脾细胞过继转移抗病毒抗性的能力没有影响。我们现在表明,用兔抗小鼠免疫球蛋白G加补体类似地耗尽B细胞,或通过黏附于葡聚糖凝胶G-10柱来去除巨噬细胞,也不会损害血清保护小鼠脾细胞的保护能力。血清保护的DBA/2小鼠单独纯化的脾T细胞或B细胞能够过继转移抗病毒抗性,这一发现支持了这些结果反映了不止一种脾细胞群体转移抗病毒抗性的能力,而非非T、非B、非巨噬细胞区室的活性。鉴于先前报道的亚致死剂量照射对FLV白血病发生的影响可能会使在该系统中进行的过继转移实验的解释复杂化,因此使用Winn型试验进行了类似研究,即将假定的效应细胞与病毒预孵育,然后将混合物接种到未照射的小鼠体内。这些Winn试验实验产生了相同的结果,即血清保护的脾细胞再次阻止了病毒性白血病的发生,单独消除T细胞、B细胞或巨噬细胞对其保护活性没有影响。此外,血清保护的脾细胞和正常脾细胞的混合转移也保护经照射的小鼠免受FLV攻击,这进一步证明这种过继保护真正反映了血清保护小鼠脾脏中存在病毒特异性效应细胞,而不是这些脾细胞无法替代受体动物中对辐射敏感的病毒靶细胞,因为这些靶细胞应由转移混合物中的正常脾细胞提供。