Jorde A, Kästli K, Hamann B, Pockrandt H
Zentralbl Gynakol. 1983;105(13):855-62.
200 pregnant women with supporting pessary treatment because of cervical insufficiency were compared with one of normal pregnancies concerning microbiological findings and puerperal morbidity. -- 5,5% of the women in the supporting pessary group had pathogenic organisms in their cervix before first amnioscopy, compared to 2% in the control group. The different results of cultural microbiologic examinations in both groups depend on type and duration of birth as well as time of amnion rupture. Women with premature rupture of the membranes (31,0%) had more pathogenic organisms than women with rupture (2,5%) in time. There was no higher infection morbidity compared to the control group.
将200例因宫颈机能不全接受子宫托治疗的孕妇与正常妊娠孕妇之一在微生物学检查结果和产褥期发病率方面进行比较。——子宫托组中5.5%的女性在首次羊膜镜检查前宫颈中有致病微生物，而对照组为2%。两组培养微生物学检查结果的差异取决于分娩类型和持续时间以及羊膜破裂时间。胎膜早破的女性（31.0%）比胎膜按时破裂的女性（2.5%）有更多致病微生物。与对照组相比，感染发病率没有更高。
