• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对刺激变化的反应:杏仁核损伤引发的缺陷与海马体损伤相似。

Response to stimulus change: amygdalar lesion elicits similar deficit as hippocampal damage.

作者信息

Lukaszewska I, Markowska A

出版信息

Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 1983;43(2):79-88.

PMID:6613698
Abstract

We attempted to test whether the effect of amygdaloid lesion on the response-to-change would be similar to that observed previously after hippocampal damage. Twelve rats with lesions in the cortico-basomedial region of the amygdala (CBM) and 20 sham operated controls were used. The experiment was conducted in a T-maze under two different conditions of stimulus presentation in trial 1. In the passive test the rat was allowed to inspect the white-black maze arms, but was prevented from entering them by transparent partitions. In the active test the rat was permitted to explore the entire T-maze. In both tests, the brightness of one arm was changed in trial 2, so that the two arms were alike. Control rats showed a statistically significant pre-ponderance of choices of the changed arm in both tests. CBM rats responded on a chance level in the passive test, while in the active one they performed like controls. These results, replicating closely the previous findings on rats with hippocampal damage, indicate the involvement of both the amygdala and hippocampus in the passive version of the response-to-change test. The postoperative disturbance might be interpreted as an attentional deficit or a selective impairment of information processing in the passive version of the test.

摘要

我们试图测试杏仁核损伤对变化反应的影响是否与先前观察到的海马损伤后的影响相似。使用了12只杏仁核皮质-基底内侧区域(CBM)有损伤的大鼠和20只假手术对照组大鼠。实验在T形迷宫中进行,在试验1中有两种不同的刺激呈现条件。在被动测试中,大鼠被允许检查黑白相间的迷宫臂,但被透明隔板阻止进入。在主动测试中,大鼠被允许探索整个T形迷宫。在两种测试中,试验2时改变了其中一个臂的亮度,使两个臂变得一样。对照组大鼠在两种测试中对改变臂的选择都有统计学上显著的优势。CBM大鼠在被动测试中随机做出反应,而在主动测试中它们的表现与对照组相似。这些结果与先前对海马损伤大鼠的研究结果非常相似,表明杏仁核和海马体都参与了变化反应测试的被动版本。术后的干扰可能被解释为注意力缺陷或测试被动版本中信息处理的选择性损伤。

相似文献

1
Response to stimulus change: amygdalar lesion elicits similar deficit as hippocampal damage.对刺激变化的反应:杏仁核损伤引发的缺陷与海马体损伤相似。
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 1983;43(2):79-88.
2
Response to stimulus change following observation or exploration by the rat: differential effects of hippocampal damages.
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 1981;41(4):325-38.
3
Cue distinctiveness and response-to-change in scopolamine injected or hippocampal rats.东莨菪碱注射或海马损伤大鼠的线索独特性与变化反应
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 1988;48(4):137-44.
4
Response to stimulus change following observation or exploration by the rat: a confirmation of differential effects of hippocampal damages.
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 1982;42(4-5):433-7.
5
Exploratory motivation in response-to-change test in rats.
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 1980;40(1):161-71.
6
Memory for magnitude of reinforcement: dissociation between the amygdala and hippocampus.
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1995 Nov;64(3):237-44. doi: 10.1006/nlme.1995.0006.
7
Spatial memory deficit following fimbria-fornix lesions: independent of time for stimulus processing.穹窿海马伞损伤后的空间记忆缺陷:与刺激处理时间无关。
Physiol Behav. 1979 Jul;23(1):11-5.
8
Retrograde amnesia for fear-potentiated startle in rats after complete, but not partial, hippocampal damage.大鼠海马完全损伤而不是部分损伤后,对恐惧增强的惊跳反应出现逆行性遗忘。
Neuroscience. 2010 Jun 2;167(4):974-84. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.03.005. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
9
Patterned (single) alternation in infant rats after combined or separate lesions of hippocampus and amygdala.海马体和杏仁核联合或单独损伤后幼鼠的模式化(单一)交替。
Behav Neurosci. 1989 Dec;103(6):1159-67. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.103.6.1159.
10
Memory impairment in patients with stereotaxic lesions to the hippocampus and amygdala.海马体和杏仁核立体定向损伤患者的记忆障碍。
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 1994;54(4):393-403.