Stambrook M
J Clin Neuropsychol. 1983 Sep;5(3):247-69. doi: 10.1080/01688638308401173.
This paper reviews the literature to date on the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery (LNNB). Consideration of the literature leads to the conclusion that the battery does not meet the stated goal of combining Luria's qualification of the symptom approach with a standardized, quantitative approach to neuropsychological assessment. While the LNNB does not approximate Luria's approach, there are data to suggest that the battery may have potential as a quantitative, standardized battery. However, numerous substantial statistical and methodological problems with the research base preclude the endorsement of the battery for clinical use. Nevertheless, the efficacy of the LNNB in clinical situations will rest, not on the developer's and publisher's claims, or on detractor's critiques, but on carefully planned and well-executed research. Until such research appears, caution is urged to those who would attempt to use this instrument in clinical situations.
本文回顾了迄今为止关于鲁利亚-内布拉斯加神经心理成套测验(LNNB)的文献。对这些文献的考量得出结论,该成套测验未能实现将鲁利亚对症状法的限定与标准化、定量的神经心理评估方法相结合这一既定目标。虽然LNNB与鲁利亚的方法并不相近,但有数据表明该成套测验可能具有作为定量、标准化成套测验的潜力。然而,研究基础中存在大量实质性的统计和方法问题,妨碍了对该成套测验用于临床的认可。尽管如此,LNNB在临床情境中的有效性将不取决于开发者和出版商的主张,也不取决于批评者的批评,而是取决于精心规划和执行良好的研究。在出现此类研究之前,强烈建议那些试图在临床情境中使用该工具的人谨慎行事。