Taylor M A, Abrams R
Psychiatr Clin (Basel). 1983;16(2-4):234-44.
We studied a sample of 111 Feighner manics divided into 42 'pure' manics without any schizophrenic features, 41 manics with one such feature, and 28 with two or more such features. The three groups did not significantly differ on any major demographic, clinical, historical, treatment response, laboratory, or familial variable tested. We also applied the DSM-III schizophrenia and schizophreniform criteria to these 111 Feighner manics. Only 1 manic had an index episode longer than 6 months (a necessary criterion for schizophrenia), whereas 13 (12%) satisfied the schizophreniform criteria. We compared these 13 Feighner manics satisfying DSM-III schizophreniform criteria with the remaining 97 Feighner manics and could find no major demographic, clinical, or laboratory differences between the two groups. Although not statistically significant, the morbidity risk for affective disorder in the first-degree relatives of the 97 Feighner manics was three times the risk in the relatives of the Feighner manics who also satisfied the DSM-III schizophreniform criteria. The morbidity risk for alcoholism in these relatives was one-half that of first-degree relatives of the 'schizophreniform' manics. The two groups did not differ in total risk for alcoholism and affective disorder.
我们研究了111名费格纳躁狂症患者样本,将其分为42名无任何精神分裂症特征的“纯”躁狂症患者、41名有一项此类特征的躁狂症患者和28名有两项或更多此类特征的躁狂症患者。在测试的任何主要人口统计学、临床、病史、治疗反应、实验室或家族变量方面,这三组患者没有显著差异。我们还将《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM - III)的精神分裂症和精神分裂症样障碍标准应用于这111名费格纳躁狂症患者。只有1名躁狂症患者的索引发作超过6个月(精神分裂症的必要标准),而13名(12%)符合精神分裂症样障碍标准。我们将这13名符合DSM - III精神分裂症样障碍标准的费格纳躁狂症患者与其余97名费格纳躁狂症患者进行了比较,发现两组在主要人口统计学、临床或实验室方面没有差异。尽管无统计学意义,但97名费格纳躁狂症患者的一级亲属患情感障碍的发病风险是那些也符合DSM - III精神分裂症样障碍标准的费格纳躁狂症患者亲属的三倍。这些亲属中酒精中毒的发病风险是“精神分裂症样”躁狂症患者一级亲属的一半。两组在酒精中毒和情感障碍的总风险方面没有差异。