Dorsch M M, Cameron A S, Robinson B S
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1983;77(3):372-7. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(83)90167-0.
This paper reviews the history, epidemiology and control of primary amoebic meningoencephalitis (PAM), caused by Naegleria fowleri, with particular reference to South Australia. The intention has been to outline misconceptions and uncertainties pervading the earlier literature. Although PAM infections elsewhere have been attributed to cysts in air-borne dust, we believe that contact with water in the domestic environment was not adequately considered as a potential source of these infections. Several reports have cast doubt on the effectiveness of chlorine in controlling N. fowleri, although there is laboratory and South Australian field experience to the contrary. These reports can be traced to a misunderstanding of the circumstances surrounding cases of PAM reported by other workers. Provided that a continuous free chlorine residual of 0.5 mg/l can be maintained in water accessible to N. fowleri, the risk of disease should be negligible. The failure of amphotericin B therapy to save recent victims of the disease, despite relatively prompt intervention, is disappointing. Possible reasons for this, and the reports that rifampin or tetracycline combined with amphotericin might be more successful, are discussed.
本文回顾了由福氏耐格里阿米巴引起的原发性阿米巴脑膜脑炎(PAM)的历史、流行病学及防控情况,特别提及南澳大利亚地区。目的是梳理早期文献中普遍存在的误解和不确定性。尽管其他地方的PAM感染被归因于空气中灰尘中的囊肿,但我们认为家庭环境中的水接触作为这些感染的潜在来源未得到充分考虑。几份报告对氯控制福氏耐格里阿米巴的有效性提出质疑,尽管有实验室及南澳大利亚地区的实地经验表明情况相反。这些报告可追溯到对其他研究人员报告的PAM病例相关情况的误解。只要在福氏耐格里阿米巴可接触到的水中能维持0.5毫克/升的持续游离氯残留量,疾病风险应可忽略不计。尽管进行了相对及时的干预,但两性霉素B疗法未能挽救近期该病患者,令人失望。本文讨论了出现这种情况的可能原因,以及关于利福平或四环素与两性霉素联合使用可能更有效的报告。