Mäkelä O, Péterfy F
Eur J Immunol. 1983 Oct;13(10):815-9. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830131007.
Solid-phase immunoassay-derived antibody titers are often converted to weight unit concentrations with the aid of standard sera containing known antibody concentrations. Systematic studies justifying this procedure have not yet been published. We therefore investigated the magnitude of errors associated with this conversion. Antibody concentrations of thirteen sera or ascites fluids were determined by quantitative precipitation or equilibrium dialysis, and one was then used as a "standard antibody" for the others in solid-phase radioimmunoassay (SP-RIA) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) assays. Antibody concentrations determined by the conventional solid-phase assay (the "standard serum" has the same specificity as the "sample") had up to fourfold errors. These errors could be reduced by basing the conversion on the combination of two standard sera instead of one. The possibility was studied of whether the conversion to weight units could be done with the aid of a standard serum directed to a different antigen than the sample antibody. Errors associated with the use of such a heterologous standard were not significantly greater than those found using the conventional conversion. A combination of two reference sera again reduced the errors. The use of such heterologous standard(s), however, requires checking the binding capacity of the antigen coats.
固相免疫测定得出的抗体滴度通常借助含有已知抗体浓度的标准血清转换为重量单位浓度。尚未发表证明该程序合理的系统性研究。因此,我们调查了与这种转换相关的误差大小。通过定量沉淀或平衡透析测定了13份血清或腹水的抗体浓度,然后将其中一份用作固相放射免疫测定(SP-RIA)或酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)中其他样本的“标准抗体”。通过传统固相测定法测定的抗体浓度(“标准血清”与“样本”具有相同的特异性)存在高达四倍的误差。通过基于两种标准血清而非一种血清的组合进行转换,可以减少这些误差。研究了是否可以借助针对与样本抗体不同抗原的标准血清将其转换为重量单位。与使用这种异源标准相关的误差并不比使用传统转换方法时发现的误差大很多。两种参考血清的组合再次减少了误差。然而,使用这种异源标准需要检查抗原包被的结合能力。