Suppr超能文献

原发性胆汁性肝硬化的临床诊断:基于主要和次要标准的分类

Clinical diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis: a classification based on major and minor criteria.

作者信息

Taal B G, Schalm S W, ten Kate F W, Hermans J, Geertzen R G, Feltkamp B E

出版信息

Hepatogastroenterology. 1983 Oct;30(5):178-82.

PMID:6642402
Abstract

The presence of antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA) is a sensitive marker for the diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Since these antibodies are not specific for PBC, and differentiation of PBC from autoimmune chronic active hepatitis (CAH) has important therapeutic and prognostic implications, additional diagnostic criteria were investigated in 92 patients with AMA. Patients were classified as PBC, CAH, undefined chronic liver disease, or no liver disease by means of three objective methods, and these diagnoses were compared with those of the patients' own physicians. Using internationally accepted strict diagnostic criteria, it was possible to classify 42% of 92 AMA-positive patients. An unbiased computer cluster analysis with 17 variables yielded groups which varied in the severity of the disease, but did not separate clinically different nosological entities. With a diagnostic scheme which uses major and minor criteria for both PBC and CAH, the large majority of patients (86%) were classified as follows: definite PBC (n = 47), probable PBC (n = 20) and no liver disease (n = 12). Seven patients with definite PBC also showed some features of CAH, but there were no patients with only classical CAH. Patients who could not be classified, frequently had very mild liver disease not requiring treatment (6/12), or had not had liver biopsy (6/12). This new diagnostic scheme is promising as it seems to combine sensitivity with specificity for the diagnosis of PBC. If validated in another group of patients with liver disease, it may be helpful for studies on the natural history of the disease and for evaluation of treatments.

摘要

抗线粒体抗体(AMA)的存在是诊断原发性胆汁性肝硬化(PBC)的一个敏感标志物。由于这些抗体并非PBC所特有,且PBC与自身免疫性慢性活动性肝炎(CAH)的鉴别对治疗和预后具有重要意义,因此对92例AMA阳性患者进行了额外诊断标准的研究。通过三种客观方法将患者分为PBC、CAH、未明确的慢性肝病或无肝病,并将这些诊断结果与患者自身医生的诊断结果进行比较。采用国际公认的严格诊断标准,92例AMA阳性患者中有42%能够被分类。对17个变量进行的无偏计算机聚类分析得出了疾病严重程度不同的组,但并未区分临床上不同的病种实体。采用一种同时使用PBC和CAH的主要和次要标准的诊断方案,绝大多数患者(86%)被分类如下:确诊PBC(n = 47)、可能PBC(n = 20)和无肝病(n = 12)。7例确诊PBC患者也表现出一些CAH的特征,但没有仅患有典型CAH的患者。无法分类的患者,通常患有非常轻微的无需治疗的肝病(6/12),或者未进行肝活检(6/12)。这种新的诊断方案很有前景,因为它似乎结合了诊断PBC的敏感性和特异性。如果在另一组肝病患者中得到验证,它可能有助于对该疾病自然史的研究以及治疗评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验