Seino Y
Jpn Heart J. 1983 Jul;24(4):515-28. doi: 10.1536/ihj.24.515.
Since little is known concerning the effect of different types of cardiac dysfunction on the peripheral circulation in acute myocardial infarction, cardiac and peripheral circulatory hemodynamics were measured simultaneously and sequentially in the Coronary Care Unit in 40 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) using a Swan-Ganz catheter and venous occlusion plethysmography. Patients were classified by clinical assessment (Killip) and into four hemodynamic subsets (HS) according to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and cardiac index (CI) measures obtained by invasive central hemodynamic monitoring (Forrester): uncomplicated AMI, HS-I (PCWP less than or equal to 18 mmHg, CI greater than 2.2 L/min/m2) 15; pulmonary congestion, HS-II (PCWP greater than 18 mmHg, CI greater than 2.2 L/min/m2) 15; peripheral hypoperfusion, HS-III (PCWP less than or equal to 18 mmHg, CI less than or equal to 2.2 L/min/m2) 4; cardiogenic shock, HS-IV (PCWP greater than 18 mmHg, CI less than or equal to 2.2 L/min/m2) 6. Measurements taken within 48 hours after the onset of AMI showed significantly lower calf blood flow (p less than 0.05) and calf venous capacitance (p less than 0.01) and higher calf vascular resistance (p less than 0.05) in all AMI classifications compared to 10 normal subjects. In uncomplicated AMI group (Killip I and HS-I) calf blood flow and venous capacitance were significantly reduced while calf vascular resistance remained unchanged from normal. In AMI complicated by pulmonary congestion (Killip II and HS-II), in addition to reduced calf venous capacitance, calf blood flow was further significantly reduced (p less than 0.05) due, in part, to a rise in calf vascular resistance (p less than 0.05). In AMI complicated by severe heart failure and shock (Killip III, VI and HS-IV), mean changes in the periphery were not statistically different from those seen in patients with pulmonary congestion alone. In patients with AMI complicated by poor peripheral perfusion (HS-III), the peripheral changes did not show significant differences from those seen in uncomplicated AMI (HS-I). Significant correlations were found between calf blood flow and PCWP (r = -0.37, p less than 0.05) and CVP (r = -0.31, p less than 0.05); calf vascular resistance and PCWP (r = +0.36, p less than 0.05) and systemic vascular resistance (r = +0.43, p less than 0.01). Sequential daily peripheral hemodynamic changes in 14 H-I patients not requiring specific therapy showed that calf blood flow took 5 days, calf vascular resistance 3 days and calf venous capacitance 7 days to return to within normal levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
由于对于急性心肌梗死中不同类型的心功能不全对外周循环的影响了解甚少,因此,在冠心病监护病房对40例急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者,使用Swan-Ganz导管和静脉阻塞体积描记法同时并连续测量心脏和外周循环血流动力学。根据临床评估(Killip分级)以及通过有创中心血流动力学监测(Forrester)获得的肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)和心脏指数(CI)测量值,将患者分为四个血流动力学亚组(HS):无并发症的AMI,HS-I(PCWP小于或等于18 mmHg,CI大于2.2 L/min/m²)15例;肺淤血,HS-II(PCWP大于18 mmHg,CI大于2.2 L/min/m²)15例;外周灌注不足,HS-III(PCWP小于或等于18 mmHg,CI小于或等于2.2 L/min/m²)4例;心源性休克,HS-IV(PCWP大于18 mmHg,CI小于或等于2.2 L/min/m²)6例。与10名正常受试者相比,在AMI发作后48小时内进行的测量显示,所有AMI分类中的小腿血流量(p小于0.05)和小腿静脉容量(p小于0.01)均显著降低,小腿血管阻力更高(p小于0.05)。在无并发症的AMI组(Killip I和HS-I)中,小腿血流量和静脉容量显著降低,而小腿血管阻力与正常水平相比保持不变。在并发肺淤血的AMI(Killip II和HS-II)中,除了小腿静脉容量降低外,小腿血流量进一步显著降低(p小于0.05),部分原因是小腿血管阻力升高(p小于0.05)。在并发严重心力衰竭和休克的AMI(Killip III、VI和HS-IV)中,外周的平均变化与仅患有肺淤血的患者相比无统计学差异。在并发外周灌注不良的AMI患者(HS-III)中,外周变化与无并发症的AMI(HS-I)患者相比无显著差异。发现小腿血流量与PCWP(r = -0.37,p小于0.05)和中心静脉压(CVP)(r = -0.31,p小于0.05)之间存在显著相关性;小腿血管阻力与PCWP(r = +0.36,p小于0.05)和全身血管阻力(r = +0.43,p小于0.01)之间存在显著相关性。14例不需要特殊治疗的H-I患者的外周血流动力学每日连续变化表明,小腿血流量需要5天、小腿血管阻力需要3天、小腿静脉容量需要7天恢复到正常水平。(摘要截短至400字)