Bezemer P D, Netelenbos J C, Mulder C, Theune J A, Stamhuis I H, Straub J P
Stat Med. 1983 Apr-Jun;2(2):191-8. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780020213.
We provide an account of a study to assess reference limits for eight routine laboratory determinations at the Academic Hospital of the Free University, Amsterdam and emphasize methodological issues rather than results. We argue that reference limits have use mainly in the first phase of the diagnostic process. Reference and target populations should be grossly comparable, and therefore patients (after slight selection) could well serve as references. However, we found major differences between in- and out-patients, so we suggest that this factor, together with age and sex, be taken into account. To arrive at reliable limits, the size of the reference sample should be at least 100. Laboratory reports should provide percentiles, which enable a more flexible decision than do fixed limits.
我们介绍了一项在阿姆斯特丹自由大学学术医院评估八项常规实验室检测参考值范围的研究,并着重讨论方法学问题而非结果。我们认为参考值范围主要用于诊断过程的第一阶段。参考人群和目标人群应大致可比,因此(经过轻微筛选后的)患者完全可以作为参考对象。然而,我们发现门诊患者和住院患者之间存在重大差异,所以我们建议应将这一因素以及年龄和性别考虑在内。为了得出可靠的参考值范围,参考样本量应至少为100。实验室报告应提供百分位数,与固定参考值相比,百分位数能使决策更加灵活。