Suppr超能文献

[医院、健康度假村和疗养院产生的废物]

[Waste from hospitals, health resorts and sanatoria].

作者信息

Althaus H, Sauerwald M, Schrammeck E

出版信息

Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B. 1983 Sep;178(1-2):1-29.

PMID:6649987
Abstract

As part of the waste disposal planning in the administrative districts in Nordrhein-Westfalen, the present expertise intends to determines the requirements to be satisfied by the collection and intermediate storage of hospital waste, and to answer the question from a hygienic point of view as to what sort of waste may be taken to an internal garbage dump and what waste is to be burned. From among the variety of hospital refuse, that material was selected for which, as a result of the direct contact between waste and patient, a certain hygienic risk could not be entirely ruled out. This includes waste from the wards similar to private houshold garbage, medical soft waste (swabs, dressings etc.) medical solid waste (syringes, cannulae etc.). For waste other than this, disposal by way of garbage dumps is considered unproblematic or else such waste is to be disposed off in compliance with legal provisions (infection wards). For organ refuse, the only mode of disposal is by burying or burning. On perusal of the literature it was found that with regard to the hygienic condition of the above-mentioned waste, views differ widely ranging from "unobjectionable" to "infectious". Apart from this, these views are not supported by microbiological data ascertained experimentally. However, a reliable assessment cannot do without such data. Preliminary investigations were carried out to see what waste disposal routes exist in the various hospitals; then in two hospitals the waste volume of each ward was determined on 7 workdays over a total period of approx. two months and the waste was checked for the three sorts of refuse mentioned above. It was found that the refuse averaged 0.54 or 0.56 kgs per bed per day and 5.44 or 5.43 litres per bed per day with a specific weight of 0.10 kg/l. The microbiological analyses included both hospital refuse and "normal" household garbage from three dumps. Within the first group of waste the analyses covered not only waste conglomerates but also individual refuse ingredients (e.g. syringes). The workup comprised 264 waste samples from the hospital area and 21 samples from dumps, which were subjected to quantitative and qualitative microbiological tests. The results showed that hospital refuse very often contains less pathogens than household garbage and that it was even germ-free in some cases; especially individual samples repeatedly proved to be free of bacterial growth.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

作为北莱茵 - 威斯特法伦州行政区废物处理规划的一部分,本专业意见旨在确定医院废物收集和中间储存需满足的要求,并从卫生角度回答何种废物可运往内部垃圾场以及何种废物需焚烧的问题。在各类医院垃圾中,选取了因废物与患者直接接触而无法完全排除一定卫生风险的物质。这包括病房中类似生活垃圾的废物、医用软废物(棉签、敷料等)、医用固体废物(注射器、套管等)。对于除此之外的其他废物,通过垃圾场处理被认为没有问题,或者此类废物需按照法律规定进行处理(感染病房)。对于器官废物,唯一的处理方式是掩埋或焚烧。查阅文献发现,关于上述废物的卫生状况,观点差异很大,从“无异议”到“有传染性”不等。除此之外,这些观点并未得到实验确定的微生物数据的支持。然而,没有此类数据就无法进行可靠评估。首先进行了初步调查,以了解各医院存在哪些废物处理途径;然后在两家医院,在大约两个月的总时间内,于7个工作日确定每个病房的垃圾量,并对上述三种垃圾进行检查。结果发现,垃圾平均每天每床位为0.54或0.56千克,每天每床位为5.44或5.43升,比重为0.10千克/升。微生物分析包括医院垃圾和来自三个垃圾场的“正常”生活垃圾。在第一类废物中,分析不仅涵盖垃圾集合体,还包括单个垃圾成分(如注射器)。检测工作包括来自医院区域的264个垃圾样本和来自垃圾场的21个样本,这些样本接受了定量和定性微生物测试。结果表明,医院垃圾通常含有的病原体比生活垃圾少,在某些情况下甚至无菌;特别是个别样本多次被证明没有细菌生长。(摘要截取自400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验