Stanton A N, Oakley J R
Arch Dis Child. 1983 Nov;58(11):878-81. doi: 10.1136/adc.58.11.878.
The reasons for referral to hospital of 147 babies subsequently included in the DHSS study of postneonatal infant mortality were analysed and compared with those of 104 control infants. Although similar numbers were seen as outpatients, 71 (16%) of the babies who died unexpectedly, but only 28 controls had previously been admitted to hospital. The excess was explained by acute infections, loss of consciousness, possible child abuse, and failure to thrive for non-organic reasons. The average length of admission was almost twice that required by controls, and 31% were admitted more than once. The admissions were often clues to important family problems that might have been investigated further. There were no admissions for unexplained apnoea and 'near miss' cot deaths may not therefore represent a suitable model for the investigation of most unexpected deaths during infancy.
随后被纳入卫生和社会保障部(DHSS)新生儿后期婴儿死亡率研究的147名婴儿被转诊至医院的原因进行了分析,并与104名对照婴儿的原因进行了比较。尽管门诊就诊人数相似,但71名(16%)意外死亡的婴儿此前曾住院,而对照婴儿中只有28名曾住院。差异的原因是急性感染、意识丧失、可能的虐待儿童以及非器质性原因导致的发育不良。平均住院时间几乎是对照婴儿的两倍,31%的婴儿不止一次住院。这些住院情况往往是可能需要进一步调查的重要家庭问题的线索。没有因不明原因呼吸暂停而住院的情况,因此“险些发生”的婴儿床死亡可能并不代表调查婴儿期大多数意外死亡的合适模型。