Risk of PID 5x greater from Dalkon Shield than from other IUDs.
出版信息
Fam Plann Perspect. 1983 Sep-Oct;15(5):225-6.
PMID:6653739
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Risk of PID 5x greater from Dalkon Shield than from other IUDs.
Fam Plann Perspect. 1983 Sep-Oct;15(5):225-6.
2
Type of intrauterine device and the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease.
Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Jul;62(1):1-6.
3
Reconsidering the IUD.
Fam Plann Perspect. 1992 Jan-Feb;24(1):33-5.
4
New studies link IUDs, infertility; say copper devices safer.
Contracept Technol Update. 1985 Jun;6(6):81-3.
5
Long-term study of the safety of the Dalkon Shield and Gyne-T 200 intrauterine devices.
CMAJ. 1986 Apr 1;134(7):747-51.
6
A review of the association between intrauterine devices and acute pelvic inflammatory disease.
J Reprod Med. 1978 Apr;20(4):200-4.
7
The Dalkon Shield debate.
Conn Med. 1983 Mar;47(3):138-41.
8
Was the Dalkon Shield a safe and effective intrauterine device? The conflict between case-control and clinical trial study findings.
Fertil Steril. 1992 Jun;57(6):1151-76. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55068-7.
9
Another look at the Dalkon Shield: meta-analysis underscores its problems.
Contraception. 1993 Jul;48(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90060-k.
10
Primary tubal infertility in relation to the use of an intrauterine device.
N Engl J Med. 1985 Apr 11;312(15):937-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198504113121501.
Zotero 插件